Inspector General of Police Khalid Ismail recent revelation has helped to cut through the fog of disinformation and rumours that have swept across the country, especially on social media, regarding the Rohingya refugees.
In particular, the inspector general said that criminal cases involving the Rohingya between 2024 and this year were 89, which is 0.02% of all the crimes recorded nationwide.
It is hoped that this crucial data would help to some extent reduce the unrestrained fear that the Rohingya community has become an increasing threat to public safety, if not national security.
At the heart of this anxiety is the unjust tarring of the Rohingya community with the same brush. Of course, the bad apples in the community must be brought to justice in accordance with our laws.
If the misconduct of a few indeed represents a particular community, then every Malay(sian) is culpable when their political leaders are caught for stealing a humongous amount of public funds.
- Sign up for Aliran's free daily email updates or weekly newsletters or both
- Make a one-off donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara (ALIRAN), Maybank a/c 507246118995 or CIMB a/c 8004240948
- Make a pledge or schedule an auto donation to Aliran every month or every quarter
- Become an Aliran member
That would be collective guilt imposed on them. Let that sink in.
The police chief also revealed that between 7,000 and 8,000 Rohingya refugees were previously resettled to third countries each year, rightly indicating that their stay here isn’t meant to be permanent.
However, owing to constraints faced by the countries concerned, the resettlement process had been frozen. The waiting period has, therefore, been prolonged.
In the meantime, the people who had fled their homeland in Myanmar to escape from persecution, harassment, slaughter and other atrocities are now facing a surge of hate speech from some Malaysians, a few of whom had also resorted to vigilantism.
An online petition, which has since been taken down, called for the removal of the Rohingya from this country – a sentiment driven by the unfounded claim that they were seeking citizenship or special rights.
The accompanying language spewed by these angry Malaysians was unmistakably vile and hurtful to the Rohingya, who already had lost their safety and suffered in their homeland.
It would be baffling for some to see that Malaysians, who had generally shown compassion and humanity towards the besieged and persecuted Palestinians, now seem to have lost the ability to understand and empathise with the plight of the Rohingya.
There was a video clip on social media showing a man, supposedly Malaysian, taunting a child who was claimed to be Rohingya.
If this clip was meant to be a joke, it was distasteful. If it was aimed at inciting further harassment, that is vicious and dangerous.
Public expressions from certain government officials and politicians regarding the Rohingya were not helpful either.
For instance, an official reportedly warned Malaysians to keep an eye on the Rohingya – a move that would go a long way towards stoking suspicion, distrust and xenophobia.
To be clear, the dehumanisation of the Rohingya in various ways does not place the Malaysians concerned on a moral high ground. It only reflects badly on the latter.
Certain leaders of the Rohingya community had acknowledged the concerns harboured by Malaysians, such as cleanliness, public safety, housing and business competition.
There is also the worry, particularly expressed online, among the locals that the Rohingya’s presence has become a burden on infrastructure and social services.
But these issues should not be made an excuse for intimidation, verbal and physical harassment, and even a threat to the life of the Rohingya.
There should be civil engagement in the attempt to seek amicable solutions to problems confronting both the locals and the Rohingya. The government can play a useful role in this context, if it has not already.
Challenges are bound to emerge from time to time, especially with a long stay in Malaysia.
There will be a need for the Rohingya to have the basic necessities of life, such as healthcare, education, housing and a means of living.
Meeting such needs is not only meant for survival. It is also to protect human dignity.
Like other children, Rohingya children deserve an early education to prepare them for later life, especially when they resettle in a third country. Denying them basic education is to steal their future.
That is why disrupting their learning centres is inhumane. These are probably run on low budgets and staffed by concerned volunteers who are likely paid low wages, if at all.
Similarly, healthcare is vital to the Rohingya, and yet the price for treatment in government hospitals is said to be beyond the reach of many Rohingya, especially the poor.
Putting food on the table makes it necessary for the Rohingya to seek work. But being undocumented makes them vulnerable, exposed to exploitation and even bullying.
That is why the recent proposal by Entrepreneur and Cooperatives Development Minister Steven Sim to absorb eligible Rohingya into the legal workforce should be addressed. There are also jobs locals tend to shun.
He rightly argued that giving the Rohingya legal access to work could improve their livelihoods, as well as reduce social problems.
Incidentally, why bring in migrant workers when there is a ready pool of people already here who are willing to work?
The government needs to set up a legal framework for the purpose of helping these people, who have lost everything, to rebuild their lives while in transit.
The Rohingya issue should not bring out the devil in us. – Malay Mail
AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
- Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
- Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
- Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
- Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
- Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
