Home Civil Society Voices 2010 Civil society voices Indian academics, activists rally behind Roy

Indian academics, activists rally behind Roy

Follow us on our Malay and English WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, Tiktok and Youtube channels.

Indian activists and academics have condemned the right-wing BJP’s demand that “the strongest possible action” be taken against writer-activist Arundhati Roy for her “seditious comments”.

Arundhati Roy
Arundhati Roy - Photo credit: outlookindia.com

We condemn the demand of the BJP to “take the strongest possible action” against Arundhati Roy for her “seditious comments” at the seminar, “Azadi: The only way” held in New Delhi on 21 October 2010. There is recorded evidence to prove that the views expressed by her are not new and have also been made by innumerable others before and after her. If Arundhati Roy or Syed Ali Shah Geelani (or any other speaker from that seminar) is to be arrested for what they have said, then by the same logic a number of us would have to be imprisoned not to mention the entire population of Kashmir.

The concept of `sedition’ is archaic and has no place in a modern democratic imagination. Perhaps for this reason the Drafting Committee of the Indian Constitution did not include “sedition” among the “reasonable restrictions” to Article 19(1) (a). In 1962, the Supreme Court (Kedar Nath Singh vs. the State of Bihar) read down Section 124A IPC to argue that only a call to violence or armed rebellion qualified to be considered as `sedition’. The same Judgement reiterated the importance of not allowing the provision to interfere with the Right to Free Speech and Expression. As the present controversy proves, the Supreme Court’s worst fears have been confirmed. The Bajrang Dal’s threat that they will hound Arundhati Roy like M.F Hussain provides further confirmation that `sedition’ will now be the new pretext for censorship. When the British charged Gandhi with sedition, he famously said, “Sedition in law is a deliberate crime but it appears to me to be the highest duty of a citizen.” Expressing dissent about the nation-state and re-imagining its future is certainly the right of every citizen if not the “highest duty”.

READ MORE:  Constitutional morality and societal morality: Safeguarding minority rights

We would like to point out that the disruption of the meeting and the allegations of `sedition’ is part of a well orchestrated campaign. The right wing elements who disrupted the Azadi meeting were working in tandem with certain media channels who flouted all norms of professional journalism to create hysteria. In what appears to be an instance of `paid news’, a certain national news channel started a one-sided campaign against “splittists” and the “sedition industry” within hours of the meeting being held. The `report’ only focused on two speakers and their supposed “seditious” utterances.

It is understandable that the BJP, in an attempt to deflect attention from the Ajmer Blast case, should indulge in hyper-jingoism but it is most unfortunate that the UPA, while deciding not to press charges of sedition against the speakers, did not assert their right to free speech and expression. Their silence on this matter has only emboldened groups like the Bajrang Dal who now want to take matters into their own hands.

This is perhaps expected from a government that has sought to suppress all dissent in the valley through brute force. Between June and October 2010, 111 people have been killed by security forces and this includes young boys who were not even participating in the protests. Countless have been maimed and injured by bullet injuries while many have been blinded by the catapults with marble shots used by the CRPF. For over two decades now, the armed and security forces have been committing extra-judicial killings, torture, disappearances and rape with impunity. Draconian legislations like the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, the Jammu and &Kashmir Public Safety Act and the Disturbed Areas Act continue to facilitate human rights abuses in the valley. The hysterical cry to enforce the rule of law in the case of the Azadi seminar contrasts with the long silence about the widespread and systematic human rights violations in Kashmir. By allowing the speakers of the Azadi seminar to be censored, the government hopes to maintain its silence on Kashmir.

READ MORE:  Constitutional morality and societal morality: Safeguarding minority rights

We therefore demand that the government take full cognisance of the continuing violation of human rights in the valley, make the security forces fully accountable so that the guilty can be prosecuted and punished. We demand that the democratic right to free speech and expression is upheld and every citizen in this country, including the speakers of the Azadi seminar, is given full protection from any attempt to impose legal or extra-legal censorship.


Vrinda Grover Lawyer, Delhi

Shohini Ghosh Professor, Jamia Millia Islamia, Delhi

Nivedita Menon Professor, Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi

Amar Kanwar Filmmaker & Artist, Delhi

Ranjani Mazumdar Associate Professor, Jawaharlal Nehru University.

Aditya Nigam Fellow, Centre for the Study of Developing Societies

Dayanita Singh Photographer, Delhi

Urvashi Butalia Writer and Publisher, Delhi

Lawrence Liang Alternative Law Forum, Bangalore 4

Sabeena Gadihoke Associate Professor, Jamia Millia Islamia, Delhi

Saba Dewan Independent Filmmaker

Aparna Sen Filmmaker and Actress, Kolkata

Kalyan Ray Author and Professor, Morris College, USA.

Joya Chatterji Historian, Trinity College, University of Cambridge, UK.

Lakshmi Subramaniam Professor, Centre for Social Sciences, Kolkata

Kajri Jain Asst. Professor, University of Toronto, Toronto.

Kumkum Roy Historian, Professor, Jawaharlal Nehru University. Delhi

Kamala Vishweshwaran Professor of Anthropology, University of Texas, Austin

Shikha Jhingan Asst. Professor, Lady Shri Ram College, Delhi University, Delhi.

Anjali Monteiro Professor, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai.

Kalyani Menon-Sen Researcher & Independent Activist, Gurgaon

Uma Chakravarty Historian (Retired Professor, Delhi University) Delhi

KP Jayshankar Professor, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai.

Pamela Philipose Journalist & Director. Womens Feature Service

READ MORE:  Constitutional morality and societal morality: Safeguarding minority rights

Harsh Mandar Writer and Activist

Gauhar Raza Filmmaker & Poet, Delhi

Anuradha Chenoy Professor, Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi

Shabnam Hashmi Social Activist, Anhad

Neeraj Malik Associate Professor, Indraprastha College, Delhi University

Javed Malick Retired Professor, Delhi University

Madhu Bhaduri Former, IFS Officer

Anuradha Bhasin Executive Editor, Kashmir Times

Jyotsna Kapur Assoc. Professor, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.

Dunu Roy Environmentalist, Hazard Centre, Delhi

Kamal Mitra Chenoy Professor, Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi

Ujjwal Kumar Singh Professor, Delhi University, Delhi.

Mahua Sarkar Assoc. Professor, Binghampton University, SUNY

Arvind Narrain Lawyer, Alternative Law Forum

Rebecca M. John Lawyer, Delhi

Amita Baviskar Associate Professor, Institute of Economic Growth

Sarada Balagopalan Associate Fellow, CSDS

Kaushik Ghosh Assistant Professor, University of Texas, Austin

November 2010

The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
  1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
  2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
  3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
  4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
  5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps:
Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
20 Nov 2010 3.43am

The authorities should leave her be and should not take punitive action simply to show that the Dravidian/Vedic civilisation respects freedom of speech.

But make clear to the people who would be influenced, exactly what she could be standing for – fifth columnism for a neo-colonial front.

Jammu and Kashmir will be freed when global permissions permit, but now is not the time.

20 Nov 2010 3.46am

Errata . . . when global **conditions** permit . . .

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x