No immunity for rape

Source: Malaysiakini

Join us on Telegram and Instagram for the latest.

There is an urgent need to reject sexual violence, irrespective of whether such violence is committed in Malaysia or abroad, says Prema Devaraj.

Source: Malaysiakini
Source: Malaysiakini

The Malaysian government’s decision to allow the extradition of its diplomatic attache Muhammad Rizalman Ismail, who was charged on 10 May in a Wellington District Court in New Zealand with burglary and assault with intent to commit rape on a 21-year-old woman, is welcomed.

It was of great concern to many that instead of being made to stand trial, Rizalman was flown back to Malaysia on 22 May under the protection of diplomatic immunity, despite the seriousness of the alleged crime.

The actions by our government, i.e., requesting the sealing of all documentation pertaining to the case and the withdrawal of all charges against Muhammad Rizalman as well as the decision not to waive diplomatic immunity, did not bode well for the government’s standing not only in the eyes of its citizens but also in the international arena.

The use of diplomatic immunity at that point effectively enabled the accused to evade a criminal justice process where he would have been made to account for his alleged actions.

By allowing this, the Malaysian government was in breach of General Recommendation 28 of the Convention for the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (Cedaw), to which Malaysia is a signatory. Cedaw states that our government has a duty, among other things, to bring perpetrators of violence against women to trial and to impose punishment.

The Defence Minister and the Foreign Minister had assured Malaysians that justice would prevail and that Rizalman would face a board of inquiry set up by the defence ministry, and if accusations were found to be true, he would be court-martialed.

READ MORE:  The 'joke' that falls flat on women’s dignity

But many Malaysians were left wondering how a board of inquiry could be used to investigate a serious criminal offence, i.e., attempted rape. It raised a fundamental question of the government’s approach towards investigating sexual crime.

Furthermore it was unclear how an investigation into the alleged crime could properly take place given that the victim and investigating officers were in New Zealand.

More than a month after Rizalman’s return, the status of the investigation in Malaysia was as yet unknown.

The government must act to fulfil both local and international commitments towards ending violence against women. There is an urgent need to stand resolute in rejecting sexual violence, irrespective of whether such violence occurs on Malaysian soil or is committed by a Malaysian abroad.

As such, the decision taken to send Rizalman back to New Zealand to stand trial is the appropriate step to take.

Prema Devaraj is a programme consultant at the Women’s Centre for Change in Penang.

Source: The Malaysian Insider.

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Notify of
1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x