To break the decades-long cycle of politically motivated arrests of peaceful critics, Burma’s new government should look systematically at laws long used to stifle basic freedoms, reports Human Rights Watch.
The new Burmese government, led by the National League for Democracy (NLD), has taken a major step in releasing about 200 political prisoners and detainees.
It has also pledged to release remaining political prisoners or have their politically motivated charges dropped by the end of April 2016.
The NLD-led government should also use its absolute majorities in both houses of parliament to repeal or amend the many rights-abusing laws that have been used to prosecute dissidents and others during a half-century of mostly military rule.
“The new NLD-led government’s release of large numbers of political prisoners has been welcomed in Burma and around the world, but there are hundreds more still in prison or facing charges,” said Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “The NLD has correctly made releasing political prisoners a priority and should now follow through to ensure that all remaining activists are freed and that charges dropped against hundreds of others.”
- Sign up for Aliran's free daily email updates or weekly newsletters or both
- Make a one-off donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB a/c 8004240948
- Make a pledge or schedule an auto donation to Aliran every month or every quarter
- Become an Aliran member
Political prisoner groups estimate that 121 political activists remain in prison and another 320 people are facing charges for political offenses.
On 7 April, NLD leader Aung San Suu Kyi, the newly appointed state counsellor to President Htin Kyaw and the parliament, announced a plan to release political prisoners and activists facing charges for political activities. Under section 204 of the Burmese constitution and section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure granting the president power to issue pardons, the government pledged to release all political prisoners, but did not provide a timetable for the promised releases.
On 8 April, 199 activists, including 69 students facing a prolonged trial for protests against the National Education Law in 2015, were pardoned or had charges dropped and were released from custody. Those released included protest leaders Honey Oo, Phyo Phyo Aung, Nandar Sit Aung, Kyaw Ko Ko, Min Thway Thit, and Lin Hlet Naing. Prominent activists, such as the 88 Generation Peace and Open Society members Mei Mei and Nilar Thein, and land rights activists Su Su Nway and Naw Ohn La, were also pardoned and released.
More than 2,000 other prisoners whose sentences were almost completed were also released in a general amnesty scheduled before the national Thingyan water festival, which started on the week of 10 April and continued for several days. A statement from Aung San Suu Kyi’s office, late on Friday, 8 April, announced that the process of releases would be delayed over the holiday, but all other political prisoners would be freed or have charges dropped by the end of April.
In a sign of the challenges ahead, on 8 April, a court in Mandalay sentenced two Muslim inter-faith activists to an additional two years in prison with hard labour. Pwint Phyu Latt and Zaw Zaw Latt, already sentenced to two years in prison in 2016, were convicted on charges under the Unlawful Association Act section 17(a) for visits they allegedly made to the Kachin Independence Army in 2012. This follows the two-year hard-labour sentence handed down to the former NLD information officer, Htin Lin Oo, in June 2015, on charges of insulting religion. The NLD-led government should include these activists in the pardon process.
The new government has pledged to follow a definition of political prisoner that was agreed upon by the NLD and former political prisoner organizations in 2014: “Anyone who is arrested, detained or imprisoned for political reasons under political charges, or wrongfully under criminal and civil charges because of his or her perceived or known active role, perceived or known supporting role, or association with activity promoting freedom, justice, equality, human rights and civil and political rights, including ethnic rights, is defined as a political prisoner.”
Last week, the newly formed government Legal Affairs and Special Cases Assessment Commission, led by former army general and house speaker Thura Shwe Mann and including a mix of NLD members and members of parliament, proposed the amendment or repeal of 142 laws used to prosecute political activists.
Human Rights Watch called on the government to prioritise the swift repeal or amendment of key laws used by authorities against peaceful activists, such as various sections of the penal code; section 18 of the Peaceful Assembly and Procession Law, under which many students were recently charged; the 1950 Emergency Provisions Act; and section 66(d) of the Telecommunications Law, which has been used to detain activists such as Robert Khum Jarr Lee for alleged social media posts.
Activists have told Human Rights Watch that they worry legal reforms will be hampered by the Burmese military’s continuing control, mandated by the military-drafted constitution, over key ministries. Notably, the ministry of home affairs is headed by an army general appointed by the commander-in-chief, giving the military effective control over the Myanmar police force, the corrections department, and the Special Branch.
“To break the decades-long cycle of politically motivated arrests of peaceful critics of the government and military, Burma’s new government should look systematically at laws long used to stifle basic freedoms.” Adams said. “But until the constitution is amended to put the police fully under civilian control and oversight, the threat of political arrests will remain.”
AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
- Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
- Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
- Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
- Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
- Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Which ASEAN country’s doing its best to take over? Any guesses?