Home Civil Society Voices 2016 Civil Society Voices Bar seeks judicial review of attorney general’s exoneration of Najib

Bar seeks judicial review of attorney general’s exoneration of Najib

Why was former attorney general Apandi Ali's suit settled out of court? - 1MDB

Follow us on our Malay and English WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, Tiktok and Youtube channels.

The Malaysian Bar has commenced legal action in the High Court to seek a judicial review of the decisions of the attorney general of 26 January 2016, made under Article 145(3) of the Federal Constitution, says Steven Thiru.

The attorney general had decided that no criminal offence has been committed by the prime minister in respect of the three investigation papers submitted by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission.

The investigation papers are reportedly in relation to the transfers of the “MYR2.6 billion donation” and funds from SRC International Sdn Bhd into the personal bank accounts of the prime minister.

The attorney general has also instructed the MACC to close the three investigation papers.

The Malaysian Bar is of the view that the discretionary prosecutorial powers conferred on the attorney general by Article 145(3) of the Federal Constitution are not absolute or unfettered, and the exercise of these powers can be challenged in a judicial review action.

The scope and ambit of the discretionary prosecutorial powers and whether these powers were exercised in accordance to law on the facts of any given case should be determined by the courts.

This matter is of critical public interest. There should be no usurpation of the judicial powers of the courts, as it is for the courts — and not the attorney general — to decide on the innocence or guilt of a suspect in respect of any alleged crime.

The independence of the MACC in discharging its statutory duties under the MACC Act 2009 as an investigative and enforcement agency, must be protected, and any impediment to the performance of these duties must be prevented.

READ MORE:  Laksanakan reformasi institusi segera dan substantial

This matter involves serious allegations of financial impropriety, including allegations of loss of public funds, and has dire implications on the administration of justice. It must therefore be resolved in a manner consistent with the principles of the rule of law.

Steven Thiru is president of the Malaysian Bar.

The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
  1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
  2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
  3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
  4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
  5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Shamsul Kamal Ismail
Shamsul Kamal Ismail
16 Mar 2016 2.33am

I hope that the rule of law reigns without impediments, and its processes undertaken without fear or favour, lest the country’s laws are rendered meaningless.
I hope that the Malaysian Bar will be able to bring out the true meaning, purpose and spirit intended by, and of The Malaysian Federal Constitution.
Good luck, Malaysian Bar!

Gan Sc
Gan Sc
15 Mar 2016 9.38pm

Bar council must sue those maruahless intergretiti deficient b… till high noon

2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x