Home Civil Society Voices Judiciously exercise discretion to hold proceedings ‘in camera’

Judiciously exercise discretion to hold proceedings ‘in camera’

A royal commission of inquiry into the judiciary is needed

Join us on Telegram and Instagram for the latest.

The Malaysian Bar is concerned to read of a news report stating that the media were barred from covering a trial involving a policeman accused of falsifying documents in a drug case.

It was reported that those unrelated to the case were instructed to leave the court room upon the request by the deputy public prosecutor on grounds that “the charges that were to be read against the officer were sensitive and should not be reported by the media”.

General rules of procedure that dictate the conduct of a criminal trial are provided for in the Criminal Procedure Code, which in Section 7, provides: “The place in which any criminal Court is held for the purpose of inquiring into or trying any offence shall be deemed an open and public Court to which the public generally may have access.”

The circumstances in which this rule is departed from are provided for in various legislation and rely on the exercise of the discretion of the court to decide on whether or not the facts of the case justify the conduct of proceedings “in camera”.

The Malaysian Bar recognises that this discretion exists in the interest of justice, public safety and national security, or for the protection of vulnerable classes of persons, or sensitive information. Exceptions that include those mentioned above should not be abused on feeble grounds, such as sensitivity of a particular charge as advanced by the DPP in this case. The DPP, in executing the powers of the public prosecutor, plays a crucial role in balancing the freedom of the press, protecting the natural right of the public to know as well as upholding the law.

READ MORE:  Destigmatising suicide: The role of the media

The rule of law demands equality in the dispensation of justice, and one should abide by this process of law, regardless of his or her position or stature in life. Serving the public interest should always be paramount.

The Malaysian Bar therefore calls for a more judicious exercise of this discretion, and a further bolstering of the law and its application in this area.

Abdul Fareed Abdul Gafoor is president of the Malaysian Bar

This piece dated 3 February 2020 is reproduced from here and has been edited for style only.

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x