Home Civil Society Voices RM6bn naval ships fiasco: Charge defence minister and PM at point of...

RM6bn naval ships fiasco: Charge defence minister and PM at point of award for grave losses of public funds

Parliament's Public Accounts Committee report on the littoral combat ships procurement scandal

Join us on Telegram and Instagram for the latest.

A report by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) outlining the flagrant and embarrassing mismanagement of funds leading to expenditure totalling RM6b in the procurement of littoral combat ships (LCS) – with nothing to show for it – is damning.

This entire saga demonstrates how deeply corrupt the public procurement system is up to the highest levels of government, and the complete failure of institutions to provide necessary oversight.

The Center to Combat Corruption and Cronyism (C4 Center) expresses its outrage at this state of affairs and demands that those responsible be charged and held responsible.

In December 2011 Boustead Naval Shipyard Sdn Bhd (BNS), received a letter of award from the Ministry of Defence (MoD) to design, construct, equip, install, commission, integrate, test, conduct trials and deliver six second-generation littoral combat ships patrol vessels (frigate class) at a contract value of RM9bn through direct negotiations.

BNS is a subsidiary of Boustead Heavy Industries Corp Bhd, which is itself a subsidiary of Boustead Holdings Bhd. The Malaysian Armed Forces Pension Fund, a statutory body, is a majority shareholder of Boustead Holdings Bhd, a government-linked company under the purview of the MoD.

The severity of financial mismanagement and malpractice that emerged from this project as revealed in the PAC report is staggering. Chief amongst the report’s findings include that:

  • Even from the very start, the terms of the contract were weak
  • Over RM6bn had already been paid to BNS even though not a single ship had been delivered
  • There were cost overruns of RM1.4bn
  • 15% of inventory, estimated to have cost RM1.7bn, has already been declared obsolete

Multiple questionable decisions on the part of the government were identified to have led to the ultimate failure of the combat ships project:

  • The appointment of both Contravest Advanced Devices Sdn Bhd and Contravest Electrodynamics Devices Sdn Bhd into the equipment purchase process greatly increased costs
  • The ‘due diligence’ carried out failed to detect BNS’ financial problems: BNS was forced to use a portion of the procurement funds to settle bad debts accrued from a previous project by a separate company, PSC Industries Bhd
  • BNS’ financial position is weak and in a critical state due to abuse of power
  • The design of the combat ships was decided on against the recommendations of the Navy and have not yet been finalised to this day
READ MORE:  MACC was still gathering evidence but now cannot recharge acquitted spy chief

These issues have only been a brief portrayal of the vast improprieties that have taken place under this project, made all the more shocking considering that this is not even the first defence deal that BNS has squandered.

However, the question remains: who is responsible for this?

Currently, ministers, former and serving, are engaged in a drawn-out blame game in order to divest themselves of responsibility, now that the scandal has been made public.

The spotlight has inevitably shone on Zahid Hamidi, who occupied the defence minister’s position between 2009 and 2013 – between that time, BNS submitted its “letter of intent” on 16 October 2010, and received its “letter of award” on 16 December 2011 according to the PAC report.

The contract with BNS took effect on 3 October 2013 after Zahid had already vacated the defence minister’s seat. But the indisputable fact remains that he was overseeing this project when the contract was first signed – a fact Zahid is attempting to deny.

Najib Razak, who held the dual role of both prime minister and finance minister when the combat ships’ procurement project was first taking place, has also come under scrutiny for his role in the project.

Najib himself denies any involvement, but the responsibility to account for the loss of public funds remains deeply wanting.

The French defence firm DCNS (now known as Naval Group) is once again named and strongly implicated, suggesting that it had full prior knowledge of the littoral combat ships project even before BNS was appointed as the main contractor.

READ MORE:  Scorpene ke kapal LCS: Masalah sistemik atau korupsi?

DCNS was one of the key players in Najib’s other sordid Scorpene submarine scandal that emerged in 2002. DCNS was contracted to deliver two Scorpene-class submarines; it was later found that they it refurbished versions that could not even dive in Malaysia’s tropical waters.

It was reported from French documents that kickbacks of RM570m were sent to Perimekar Sdn Bhd and other shell companies that were all controlled by Razak Baginda, a close associate of Najib at that time.

Najib himself was the defence minister and had appointed Razak to oversee the procurement of the submarines with DCNS, and [allegedly] demanded heavy bribes for high-level meetings involving his presence.

Following investigations, the former CEO, chairman and president of DCNS, as well as Razak himself, were indicted by a French court for offences related to bribery, corruption and misappropriation of assets.

It must be said here that the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) has remained silent on this scandal, speaking to its inadequacy regarding transboundary corruption and its supposed independence in nabbing powerful individuals involved in corruption.

These connections revealed here, all of which have previously been covered by C4 Center, are disturbing and demonstrate the ways in which the rot of corruption from years past continues to plague us.

Whilst it is easy to get lost in the sheer complexity of the scandal before us, at its core, this issue is about how RM9bn in taxpayers’ money, extracted from Malaysians, was promised away.

More specifically, corruption proliferates when public procurement is not transparent, and when matters of ‘national security’ are used to further obscure oversight.

READ MORE:  Azam Baki’s dig on Transparency International’s corruption perception index - a low for MACC

With that, C4 Center makes the following demands:

  • For Najib and Zahid to be held to account and charged for their serious misgivings and mismanagement leading to huge losses of public funds. This is critical to restore public trust in the system
  • For Hishammuddin Hussein to gracefully resign and accept equal blame for making false assurances of the combat ships’ delivery during his time as defence minister
  • For the former defence minister under the Pakatan Harapan government to clarify why no action was taken during his tenure
  • For the MACC to release its investigation findings
  • For Boustead officials to be held gravely responsible – the entire company must be fully audited and investigated for misappropriation of funds and for using money from the littoral combat ships’ project to bail out another company
  • For Parliament to debate the matter of defence procurement urgently, taking urgent steps to ensure proper safeguards and checks on national security-type procurement done in secret
  • For the incumbent government after the coming general election to enact a public procurement act that upholds accountability and transparency in accordance with the goals already outlined in the national anti-corruption plan (NACP). – C4 Center
AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
  1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
  2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
  3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
  4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
  5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps:


The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Most Read

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x