Kua Kia Soong
At a time when people in Malaysia yearn for accountability and truth, the Attorney General’s Chambers has chosen the path of denial and obstruction.
Its decision to appeal the High Court judgment in favour of the families of Pastor Raymond Koh and activist Amri Che Mat is not only unconscionable – it is a betrayal of justice, compassion and the very principles of the “Madani” (compassionate) government that claims to champion good governance and humanity.
The High Court’s ruling by Justice Su Tiang Joo was a landmark victory for truth. After years of anguish, the court finally affirmed what many in Malaysia already knew: that the police and the government bore responsibility for the abductions of Koh and Amri.
Instead of defending the honour of the state by seeking accountability, the Attorney General’s Chambers is now appealing the decision – an act that can only be seen as protecting institutional impunity.
- Sign up for Aliran's free daily email updates or weekly newsletters or both
- Make a one-off donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara (ALIRAN), Maybank a/c 507246118995 or CIMB a/c 8004240948
- Make a pledge or schedule an auto donation to Aliran every month or every quarter
- Become an Aliran member
Justice Su’s findings were unequivocal. He cited police involvement, wrongful case classification and failures in investigation – systemic failings that violated the most basic principles of justice. His judgments awarded RM3m to Amri’s wife, Norhayati Mohd Ariffin, and RM31m to Koh’s family.
Those figures, however symbolic, represented a rare acknowledgment by the judiciary that the Malaysian state had failed its people.
In appealing this judgment, the Attorney General’s Chambers is not merely questioning legal reasoning – it is defying the moral weight of international law. Enforced disappearance is one of the most heinous human rights violations recognised under international conventions. It is condemned globally as a crime that “places the victim outside the protection of the law”.
Crime against humanity
The UN International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance – which Malaysia has not yet ratified – declares that no exceptional circumstances, “whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency,” may justify such acts.
The UN Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances has repeatedly reminded governments that enforced disappearance is not merely a domestic issue – it is an international crime under customary international law, potentially rising to the level of a crime against humanity when widespread or systematic.
In 2019, this same UN working group urged Malaysia to investigate the abductions of Koh and Amri and to bring the perpetrators to justice. It also called on the government to end impunity for such grave violations.
Yet six years later, instead of delivering justice, the Malaysian state appears intent on silencing it – by appealing a decision that seeks to hold its own institutions accountable.
Judgement exposes state complicity
The enforced disappearances of Koh in 2017 and Amri in 2016 were not random crimes.
They were acts of intimidation against conscience, carried out with chilling precision: black sport utility vehicles (SUVs), men in tactical gear, coordinated movements – all pointing to professional execution, not rogue criminality.
These were abductions emblematic of authoritarian tactics seen elsewhere in the world, where state agents silence dissent under the cover of darkness.
If Malaysia wishes to be respected among democratic nations, it cannot afford to be seen as condoning such crimes. The Madani government’s credibility as a rights-respecting administration now hangs by a thread. To invoke ‘good governance’ while appealing a judgment that exposes state complicity in enforced disappearances is hypocrisy of the highest order.
The international community has long condemned governments that use enforced disappearance as a weapon of fear – from Latin America’s “Dirty Wars” to modern-day authoritarian regimes.
Malaysia must not allow itself to fall into that ignominious company. The government should be joining the ranks of nations that have outlawed such practices, compensated victims, and prosecuted those responsible – not shielding perpetrators behind legal technicalities.
Every day that Koh and Amri remain missing is a day Malaysia’s conscience remains clouded. Every bureaucratic appeal, every refusal to face the truth, erodes our moral standing in the eyes of the world.
The Attorney General’s Chambers must withdraw its shameful appeal. The government must heed the UN’s calls, ratify the International Convention on Enforced Disappearance, and demonstrate the moral courage it preaches.
Until it does so, the words Madani and good governance will ring hollow.
Justice delayed is justice denied. But to appeal this judgment is to desecrate justice itself –and to place Malaysia among those states that the world condemns for crimes of disappearance and silence.
Dr Kua Kia Soon, a former MP, is the director of human rights group Suaram.
AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
- Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
- Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
- Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
- Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
- Lawan rasuah dan kronisme












So use people’s (tax payer) money to pay? Who are the people that did not perform their duty? Any action being taken against them? Accountability is needed.
Useless govt!
Deep state is behind all these. The government cannot do anything. Those with actual power will just ignore. They are untouchables
Very good that the legal system can hold the govt n police liable over both Koh n Amri’s disappearances.. however, this raises questions as well – both men were abducted with the involvement of the police yet why is there disparity between the payouts? How come Koh is getting 10 times more than Amri n Amri was abducted in 2016wehile Koh was abducted in 2017..??
I think you need to examine the actual judgments for the explanation, including the number of plaintiffs in each case.
Yes agree. The judge should lay out the reasons. The difference is too far apart.
You need to take a look at the actual judgments. The calculations will probably be there.
Apparently both plaintiff filed different kind of claim towards the government. I initially thought it has something to do with the gov being clearly involved in Koh’s disappearance. But turned out the judge has different calculation.
Justice Su imposition of RM10K daily till victims’ bodies are found should hasten police to expediate immediate actions to save coffers on paying reduced penalties. Yet AGC has cheek to appeal🤬! …
why can’t the government appeal..? legal absolute is only at the end of the court of appeal. the judge could have erred, who knows. u can’t deny any party for appealing.
I am so glad that Justice still prevails for those who fought for Pastor Raymond’s family.
God is just and his grace and mercy prevails.
We have a victorious God! AMEN
We need to stand united for righteousness sake. God is still in control and justice shall prevail. The court has given a truthful verdict and it shall stand. All glory to Almighty God for His mercy and grace. Hallelujah amen