Home Civil Society Voices Tengku Adnan RM1m corruption case: We need answers!

Tengku Adnan RM1m corruption case: We need answers!

File photo: Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor Facebook

Follow us on our Malay and English WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, Tiktok and Youtube channels.

The Center to Combat Corruption and Cronyism (C4 Center) is extremely concerned by the decision of the Attorney General’s Chambers to seek a discharge not amounting to an acquittal for former federal territories minister Tengku Adnan Mansor over his RM1m corruption case.

In this case, Tengku Adnan was charged with receiving RM1m from businessman Tan Eng Boon to approve an application by Nucleus Properties Sdn Bhd (now known as Paragon City Development Sdn Bhd) to increase the industrial plot ratio of a piece of land on Jalan Semarak.

According to the deputy public prosecutor, Julia Ibrahim, instructions were given by the Attorney General’s Chambers to seek the discharge not amounting to an acquittal due to “new developments” involving a witness in the case that warranted further investigation.

The Attorney General’s Chambers will await the outcome of the investigation before deciding future action on the charge. However, no deadline has been given for the investigation as the Attorney General’s Chambers does not “know how long the investigation may take”.

This decision raises several urgent questions that the Attorney General’s Chambers must answer to the public:

  • What are these “new developments” that must be investigated further?
  • Why should these “new developments” justify the request for a discharge not amounting to an acquittal?
  • Why did the Attorney General’s Chambers choose to withdraw the case instead of allowing the court an opportunity to make a decision?
  • Why has no deadline been given for the investigation?
  • Why is the Attorney General’s Chambers vague about whether this case will be pursued after the investigation is concluded?
READ MORE:  Reform to make public prosecutors independent, end political interference

C4 Center would like to remind the Attorney General’s Chambers that this is a corruption case involving a highly scandalised public official. There is no place for opaqueness or vague statements that cast doubt on the Attorney General’s Chambers’s pursuit of the corruption charge.

How can this entire case simply be withdrawn due to “new developments”, when Tan Eng Boon himself has pleaded guilty to abetting Tengku Adnan to solicit a bribe of RM1m?

Though part of the executive, the Attorney General’s Chambers must always show independence and fearlessness in the pursuit of justice, even if it may be against a member of the government of the day.

The Malaysian public demands answers. We have already seen several high profile corruption cases simply fizzling out in the past year, notably Najib Razak’s stepson Riza Aziz being granted a discharge not amounting to an acquittal on five counts of money laundering over US$248m and former Sabah Chief Minister Musa Aman’s abrupt acquittal on 46 corruption charges.

This must not be allowed to happen again.

It is imperative for the administration of justice and public confidence that the Attorney General’s Chambers be relentless in its pursuit of corruption charges against public officials.

Malaysia’s marked improvement in last year’s Transparency International Corruption Perception Index will suffer greatly if our anti-corruption efforts continue to regress, especially if the public does not receive clear answers for why a discharge not amounting to an acquittal was sought in this corruption charge against Tengku Adnan.

C4 Center urges Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin to focus on much-needed reforms to save Malaysia from sliding down this slippery slope – one we have spent much of the past three years trying to climb.

The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
  1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
  2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
  3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
  4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
  5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps:
Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gursharan Singh
Gursharan Singh
8 Dec 2020 10.28am

Is he and most like him, though investigated or charged or sentenced, have not continued to be free [to enjoy their luxurious lifestyles] due to pendings appeals or nominal bail amounts and no closure of their legal cases, and thus without any adverse impact on their lifestyles or standing in society as the titled/elected still referred to as YB and appear to display little or no remorse or shame?
Bless all

loyal malaysian
loyal malaysian
7 Dec 2020 7.09pm

First Riza Aziz, next Musa Aman now Tengku Annan – all let off the hook.
Do we need to be a genius to see a pattern?
No, I am at ease with what is – what can we do, as PN holds power now.
But the evil doers need not be too happy as yet.
I believe in a higher power than earthly one – these evil doers and all the others in the same group will have to pay their dues when they meet their Maker.

Gursharan Singh
Gursharan Singh
8 Dec 2020 10.35am

Do they believe that there is any higher power or Makar to whom they will be answerable?
If they did belive they may not have done what they did and still be proud and continue to flaunt teh wealth with their lifestyles. Or may be they may have shared part of their gains with their Makers and thus may be confident that they are exempted from any reprisals from their Makers.
Bless all

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x