I have just been informed that the whistleblower who wrote to me about the allegations involving the business interests of Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission chief Azam Baki, is being sued.
Azam’s lawyers are demanding that the whistleblower apologise for a report she has written on this matter, issue a public apology and pay damages amounting to RM10m. The whistleblower received the letter of demand today.
I am shocked, even appalled, that this whistleblower, who raised legitimate questions of national interest, is now being sued by Azam. What Azam should be doing is publicly disclosing all his business interests to protect the image and integrity of the MACC.
By sending this letter of demand to the whistleblower, what is now occurring is nothing more than serious intimidation by Azam. If whistleblowers are threatened in this way by those in a position of power – long a trend we have seen in Malaysia – how can we make any progress to get citizens to expose corruption and protect them for doing so?
I call on Azam to withdraw this letter of demand immediately and cease his attempt to victimise the whistleblower.
I also call on the prime minister and the opposition leader to jointly act to begin an immediate review of the functioning of the MACC. The prime minister must also act immediately to create an independent panel to review the allegations of Azam’s business interests.
Dr Edmund Terence Gomez, a political economist, recently resigned from the MACC’s consultative and corruption prevention panel
- Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
- Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
- Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
- Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
- Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.
LAWS OF MALAYSIA
WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT 2010
7. (1) A whistleblower shall, upon receipt of the disclosure of improper conduct by any enforcement agency under section 6, be conferred with whistleblower protection under this Act as follows:
(a) protection of confidential information;
(b) immunity from civil and criminal action; and
(c) protection against detrimental action, and for the purpose of paragraph (c), the protection shall be extended to any person related to or associated with the whistleblower.
(2) A whistleblower protection conferred under this section is not limited or affected in the event that the disclosure of improper conduct does not lead to any disciplinary action or pros