Home Coalitions Clean and Fair Elections Latheefa Koya’s appointment: Excellent choice but flawed process

Latheefa Koya’s appointment: Excellent choice but flawed process

MACC chief Latheefa Koya

Follow us on our Malay and English WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, Tiktok and Youtube channels.

The Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections (Bersih 2.0) welcomes the appointment of Latheefa Koya as the new chief commissioner of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC).

Over the years Latheefa has proven herself to be a highly principled, courageous and straight-talking human rights defender and lawyer. Such qualities are needed to helm the MACC and deal with the scourge of corruption in this country.

Nonetheless, Bersih 2.0 is troubled by the process by which she was appointed as it highlights a structural weakness in our governance, making abuses of power inevitable.

By Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad’s own admission, he did not even consult his cabinet, let alone Parliament, on Latheefa’s appointment as he did not want the opinions of his ministers to restrict his choice.

He added that he normally makes the decision himself because he doesn’t have to ask the cabinet as to who he approves.

While current laws allow the PM to advise the king to appoint whosoever he wants, such almost absolute power in the hands of the PM does not bode well for our parliamentary democracy.

Former Prime Minister Najib Razak used the same power to appoint his allies into key positions in his attempt to escape scrutiny of the 1MDB scandal and cling on to power.

Pakatan Harapan (PH) came to power on the promise of wide-ranging institutional reforms so that there is a separation of powers – which restores the dignity of Parliament and the independence of key institutions like the MACC, the Electoral Commission, the Judicial Appointments Commission, the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia, the National Water Services Commission and government-linked investment companies.

Bersih 2.0 calls on the PH government to codify into law the independence of these institutions without delay, preferably at the next sitting of the Dewan Rakyat in July.

If a two-thirds majority in the house is required to effect constitutional amendments, we call on opposition members to lend bipartisan support so that institutional checks and balances can be firmly established.

Unless the appointment process is institutionalised, there is a risk that all the good appointments so far could be undone in a day if the next PM so wishes.

As a country, we cannot hope for and depend on the good intentions and graces of the PM but we need strong and independent institutions and processes to hold the PM and all public officials accountable.

A sound appointment process would include a nomination committee, which receives nominations from all stakeholders (including the public). Such a committee should be set up to shortlist qualified candidates. These should then be forwarded to a parliamentary select committee, which would look for a candidate who can command public confidence and then recommend the chosen candidate to the PM or even directly to the king.

While it may not be possible to undo key appointments that have already been installed, Bersih 2.0 urges the PM to respect the institution of Parliament and allow the Major Public Appointments Select Committee to conduct a review of appointed commissioners, the chief Justice, the inspector-general of police, director-generals and chairpersons of government-linked companies and government-linked companies.

The reviews would ratify the PM’s appointment and gives greater recognition and some form of legitimacy to the appointees, especially for someone like Latheefa Koya, who has a political background.

But if there are strong objections from the select committee and compelling reasons why a person should not be appointed, then the PM has to defend his decision.

Bersih 2.0 also calls on the Major Appointments Select Committee to come out with a clear scope of its mandate and process of vetting appointments. These should be made public and stakeholders consulted, especially civil society, before they are finalised.

Once again, Bersih 2.0 lauds the appointment of Latheefa Koya but urges the PM to expedite the legal amendments necessary to institutionalise and democratise the process of major appointments, including to the Electoral Commission, in future, make key public institutions independent and empower them so that they can serve as effective checks and balances.

If this could be achieved before Dr Mahathir Mohamad steps down, it would be one of his most important and enduring legacies to this nation.

Satukan tenaga, Malaysia baru!

Bersih 2.0 steering committee

The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
  1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
  2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
  3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
  4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
  5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps:
Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Benjamil Said
8 Jun 2019 12.00pm

There is no flawed process at all.

Just boisterous noise,from the those ignorant of processes or procedures.

An appointment like that does not need any support by signatures or anythiing as it is by the King and as in his power, decided and recommended by the PM.


Michelle Tan
7 Jun 2019 4.58pm

Excellent choice but flaw process! Absolutely right. But I still support Dr M’s decision.

Remember things are moving fast and we can’t afford to leave this position without a head at this crucial time especially MACC is surrounded by many crocodiles out there.
What do you think whether Dr M to act fast or to allow discussion and debate for the right candidates which require time for decision? Taking time for discussion of right candidate could jeopardise the charge of the corruption cases and allow someone influential to walk out free easily.

Perumal Kali
7 Jun 2019 7.04pm
Reply to  Michelle Tan

Michelle Tan .U are perfectly right.Only shallow minded people who hve their personal agenda & not the rakyats agenda will try to cast aspersions on the lady in waiting who is a dedicated lass & above all she is the person who is willing to listen to come to the truth before a verdict is proclaimed.She is obviously endowed with qualities born out of her inalienable right to fight for fair play & justice.She is the right person for the job as being a lady ,the quality of mercy will not be strained.

Murali Subramaniam
7 Jun 2019 3.51pm

Good choice but can’t help thinking WHY in such a way!!!! Nothing changed and nothing ever will If this continues. Latheefa being a no nonsense person should have at least asked for the due process to be followed rather than simply accepting it. You and TDM have given space for lot of arguments and unnecessary comments.

Theres Chin
7 Jun 2019 1.17pm

It is not as flawed as the cabinet not knowingly played dumb about imdb! The new MACC chief is as transparent if not better than any business-as-uasual appointment of the past. Stop making noise and help build up the nation instead, ok!

Jerry Er
7 Jun 2019 11.31am

How to justify the process is flawed when present laws allowed for it? Is a 2/3 majority needed to change the present law on this? If not then PH is guilty of not looking into such avenues for power abuse.

Allen Loh
7 Jun 2019 9.33am

Lets the result speak for itself !

Jon Ranjer
6 Jun 2019 10.15pm

I’ll go with the excellent choice anytime.

Benjamil Said
6 Jun 2019 7.58pm

Expediting the right decision.
The end justifies the means.
The rest are mere manipulated noises and frivolous.

Gerrie Teng
6 Jun 2019 7.43pm

So is it better a flawed choice but an excellent process??????

Lim Heng Hin
6 Jun 2019 7.52pm
Reply to  Gerrie Teng

Gerrie Teng , yes it’s better a flawed system but an excellent choice than an excellent system with the wrong choice. I’ll go with this.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x