Home TA Online 2012 TA Online The oldest trick in the book?

The oldest trick in the book?

Follow us on our Malay and English WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, Tiktok and Youtube channels.

Any independent inquiry into the violence that broke out at the tail-end of the Bersih 3.0 rally would not be complete without a thorough examination of whether agents provocateurs or others bent on inciting violence were present in the crowd, writes Anil Netto 

The use of agents provocateurs to incite violence in a peaceful assembly is the oldest trick in the book – though no one will ever admit to planting people in a crowd to stir violence.

Wikipedia defines ‘agent provocateur’ as follows:

Traditionally, an agent provocateur (plural: agents provocateurs, French for “inciting agent(s)”) is an agent employed by the police or other entity to act undercover to entice or provoke another person to commit an illegal act. More generally, the term may refer to a person or group that seeks to discredit or harm another by provoking them to commit a wrong or rash action.

The Oxford dictionary defines it as “a person employed to induce others to break the law so that they can be convicted”.

If a crowd becomes the innocent victims of the trap, it is used to provide justification for a crackdown or to discredit them.

So who was really responsible or sparked the violence at the tail-end of the Bersih 3.0 rally?

Let’s hear it from three people who witnessed the rally:

Mobashar Jawed Akbar, leading Indian journalist and editorial director of India Today, a member of the international fact-finding group investigating the electoral process in Malaysia, at a press conference:

One of the oldest tactics is to provoke the victim in order to blame the victim…. The crowd had ample time to be violent if it wanted to. There was no sense of violence. It was a festive celebratory experience of the people – until the point came at the very end of it. And I do believe the provocation was perhaps planned in order to create images that would play well with … officially oriented media.

Tommy Thomas, constitutional lawyer, in this commentary:

Spin-doctors went into over-drive after the event to highlight the alleged violence against police and their property. The oldest trick in the book, employed for centuries by police and law enforcement agencies globally, when trying to control crowds in large rallies and marches is to use police operatives in plain or unidentified clothes to work as agents provocateurs to start trouble. Unless an independent, credible organisation reviews all the evidence, and makes a finding that the Bersih marchers were actually responsible for causing violence, I am not prepared to accept the police version. In any event, one must also consider their provocation and intimidation that resulted in such behaviour. The entire context must be taken into account.

It was clear to me after spending more than five hours on the streets last Saturday, that those who walked were absolutely peace-loving, and opposed to any physical action, let alone violence.

S Thayaparan, a retired navy commander:

Anyone who was there will tell you that the vast majority of protestors were law-abiding and peaceful participants in this process, but what they were up against was a police force poisoned by years of Umno interference.

It would not surprise me if they were agent provocateurs who were amongst the peaceful protestors. The so-called SOP (standard operating procedure) of retrieving recording devices from well, everyone, is evidence that the practitioners of the dark arts were out in full force.

But I also (and this where I will earn the scorn of Pakatan Rakyat supporters and maybe even Bersih supporters) would not be surprised if there were those within Pakatan who thought it would be a good symbolic gesture to reclaim Dataran Merdeka or at least make a go of it.

And anyone who has attended any of these demonstrations will tell there are always people who are there just for the sake of engaging in mindless violence for the sheer hell of it and were waiting for an opportunity to explode.

So any independent inquiry against the violence that broke out would not be complete without a thorough investigation into whether agents provocateurs or other parties bent on inciting violence were present in the crowd.

READ MORE:  Where are the promised institutional reforms?

Anil Netto is honorary treasurer of Aliran.

The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
  1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
  2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
  3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
  4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
  5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps:
Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hilmi ismail
Hilmi ismail
6 May 2012 11.22am

Why were Bersih rallies in other towns held peacefully but in KL it was chaotic and violent at the tail-end of the event? The agents provocateurs were the political desperadoes who knew the herd mentality of big crowd. They took advantage of it and threw the ROCK and hid their hands.

Vasantha Ho Lim
Vasantha Ho Lim
6 May 2012 2.39am

Yes, real anak malaysia abhores violence. At the carpark behind Coliseum, witness young chap wanting to throw stones over the DBKL toilets onto police in Jalan TAR. I reprimanded him… “Adk! jangan buang!! Jangan kurang ajar macam mereka. Mereka kurang ajar, kita jangan. jangan ikut!!! And when the the crowd became bolder about to confront police, I see this suspicious looking man (with a bluetooth on his ears)standing behind a tree,with rock in his hand, ready to throw.He too I reprimanded and daring him not to throw and he walk away looking annoyed, like reporting to another man.He certainly looked like provocateur to me.From this carpark i witnessed police chasing, catching, beating and kicking bersih-ers and police snatching vcr of caucasean recording the mellee.

Liyakat Shah
Liyakat Shah
5 May 2012 9.07am

God has given us beautiful life and this life should be lead for us and also others. There is no reason to share all our amenities given by God to us but a few of things can change our life and by doing so one should not feel that our happiness would be lessening or decreased. On the contrary such good deeds would result in giving boundless and countless happiness. If God has given us excellent intelligence than do make use of it for the betterment of people to impart good qualitative things in people’s mind that too free of cost without expecting any penny or reward from it. If the so called person, child, or man is benefited by your intelligence than it would result in getting good deeds in your account as long as he earn in good and polite manner. If God has given you wealth than do share and think about your use if it goes in some lavish or extra rather than your needs than do use that extra expenditure to utilize it investing with those poor and needy people who… Read more »

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x