Home Coalitions Penang Forum Speedy approval of detailed EIA for Seri Tanjung Pinang Phase 2 raises...

Speedy approval of detailed EIA for Seri Tanjung Pinang Phase 2 raises host of serious questions

The siltation along Gurney Drive

Join us on Telegram and Instagram for the latest.

The speed with which it was approved raises serious questions about the transparency of the DOE approval process, says Penang Forum.

The siltation along Gurney Drive
The siltation along Gurney Drive

Penang Forum is shocked to learn that the Department of Environment in Putrajaya (DOE) has approved the Detail Environmental Impact Assessment (DEIA) report for the Seri Tanjung Pinang Phase 2 (STP2) development in Penang.

This project will involve reclamation of 760 acres of the sea in the north east coast of Penang island to form a man-made island which will be about 85 per cent the size of Pulau Jerejak. It will be the biggest reclamation project in Malaysia

In the public review of the DEIA report, the last day for public submission of feedback and objections was 14 March 2014. The DOE approval letter was dated 10 April 2014. All this in less than four weeks for a project of such magnitude and of significant impact to Penang and Penangites. The DOE has given new meaning to the term ‘fast track’.

Penang Forum, other NGOs and concerned Penangites submitted feedback and objections to the DOE. None of the objectors receive any acknowlegement or response. The DEIA process requires the project initiator and consultants to respond to all written comments from the public within 45 days.

The objectors raised many pertinent questions on the validity of the findings of the DEIA consultants. Flawed and questionable assumptions were used to underestimate and overvalue the proposed project.

For example, the price of shrimps was assumed to be US$200/tonne (RM0.70 per kg.) in the projected loss to the fishermen when the current market price of shrimps is about a hundred times that assumed.

In the traffic impact assessment, the public transport mode share was optimistically assumed to be 40 per cent when the current mode share is only about 3 per cent.

Was an expert panel review carried out by the DOE, as required, before approval was given? What were the findings of this expert panel review?

Were the comments and feedback submitted by the public reviewed and considered – as not a single point raised was taken in the approval letter?

This raises serious questions about the transparency of the DOE approval process and we want answers to the questions raised.

In the best interest for the people of Penang, Penang Forum calls on the Penang state government to address the issues and questions raised by NGOs and concerned Penangites.

We call on the state government to do due dilligence on this where the federal DOE in Putrajaya has failed to do so.

The DEIA report cannot be accepted as it is.

On behalf of Penang Forum Steering Committee
22 April 2014

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Notify of
1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x