Home Media statements 2010 Media Statements We are not shocked – only disappointed

We are not shocked – only disappointed

Follow us on our Malay and English WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, Tiktok and Youtube channels.

The Federal Court’s unanimous decision declaring Datuk Seri Zambry Abd Kadir the rightful mentri besar of Perak does not do justice to the judiciary. It only confirmed that the Constitutional provisions mean nothing and that the decisions of our courts need not be rooted in a sense of fairness and justice.


Nearly a decade ago, we witnessed with horror how the Federal Court headed by the then Chief Justice Tun Eusoff Chin handed over a valuable piece of land in Penang belonging to one Boonsom Boonyanit to a thief and a fraudster. Amazingly –  in spite of specific provisions protecting the rights of legitimate land owners –  the Federal Court, defying common sense and ignoring the views of the legal fraternity, deprived the legitimate land owner of her ownership to the property.

The language in the relevant section of the National Land Code (NLC) and the intention of the provision was so simple and obvious that it could not be misunderstood. It didn’t require the best legal minds to interpret this law. And yet this outrageous decision was delivered. This injustice was perpetrated by people qualified enough to understand the law. When people who are entrusted with the sacred duty to safeguard justice fail us miserably and trample upon it in such a blatant manner, we have every reason to be concerned whether the right people are appointed as  judges.

In 1995 the Federal Court was also guilty of another astounding decision that did no credit to its integrity or its standing as the custodian of justice. In the Insas Bhd vs Ayer Molek Rubber Co, the Federal Court once again ignored the obvious and simple provisions which, according to the Bar Council “raised very serious questions as to the administration of justice in Malaysia…”  

READ MORE:  Judicial appointment: Are we stuck in a quagmire of race and prejudice, preventing the judiciary from moving forward?

That decision  was perceived to have been manipulated. Even the composition of the Federal Court which heard and decided the appeal on 1 August 1995 was unconstitutional.

With its tainted past and discredited history, Malaysians will find it hard to accept the latest decision of the Federal Court. This decision will not restore their confidence in the judiciary neither will it be accepted as a decision that reflects truth and justice.

Zambry and Co may have won their day in this court today but the people’s court will deliver its verdict that will embarrass this court and give the boot to the pretenders who have been legitimised by the so-called judgment.

P Ramakrishnan


9 February 2009

The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
  1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
  2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
  3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
  4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
  5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps:
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x