Home TA Online 2017 TA Online Why put evidence on public display when case not yet proven?

Why put evidence on public display when case not yet proven?

Join us on Telegram and Instagram for the latest.

We all like to watch with glee when someone gets arrested for corruption; but remember, arrest does not prove guilt, says Angry Malaysian.

I refer to theSun’s front-page news report that the MACC had arrested a ministry secretary general and his son and wish to highlight a few concerns.

While I fully support the efforts by law enforcement authorities to implement just laws and eradicate the scourge of corruption once and for all from our shores, the process and methods must be just and fair to all parties.

I wonder about the purpose of displaying seized items such as foreign currency, watches and handbags to the public when the case has not yet been proven. Surely, this information should be kept confidential to avoid prejudicing the case against the suspect and revealing the hand of the prosecution too soon. The names of the suspect and family are withheld for precisely the same purpose; so why display the seized goods and let the public gossip unnecessarily?

I also wonder if it is just and fair – regardless of whether the MACC Act allows it – for lawyers’ offices to be raided for clients’ documents. This should be privileged information. Our justice system will fall apart if lawyers’ offices get raided for clients’ information, unless of course the lawyers themselves are party to the alleged corruption.

The MACC should also arrest and charge all the contractors and suppliers who are alleged to have given bribes to the main suspect. That is only just, and it is what society expects. These culprits may give or attempt to give bribes, and they would only complain if what they are seeking is not granted by the recipient of the bribe. That is not fair if no action is taken against those giving out bribes.

READ MORE:  MACC incident reflects lack of protection for whistleblowers?

If the recipient of a bribe is found guilty of receiving a bribe and sentence is handed out, the same sentence should be automatically handed out to those giving the bribe. Do this, and see how fast corruption disappears from our country.

We all like to watch with glee when someone gets arrested for corruption. But remember, arrest does not prove guilt. Only a court of law is legally able to pronounce guilt. Until that happens, everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Angry Malaysian is the pseudonym of an Aliran reader who is always angry because the bright future of Malaysia has been eroded by incompetence, nepotism, apathy, laziness, racism, double standards and arrogance.

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Notify of
1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x