While speaking at the “Himpunan Aspirasi Madani Rakan Pembimbing Perkhidmatan Awam” last Friday, the prime minister clarified that, while holding discussions with his Singapore counterpart, Lawrence Wong, he had broached the possibility of Singapore “volunteers” teaching English in urban poor areas and in the interior of Sabah and Sarawak.
This is an honest admission that there is an urgent need to improve the proficiency of English in the country. This is commendable!
English is the international language and its importance to the sciences, commerce and technology hardly needs any emphasis. To progress, we need a good command of English. This is the undeniable truth!
It is a wonder why the government, which has a huge majority in Parliament, does not land hard on those narrow-minded politicians who oppose any attempt to improve the standard of English and who have become an obstacle to our progress.
Anwar is an enigma to most people in this matter. He understands the need for English proficiency, yet he is contradictory. Many were bewildered when he recently ordered the civil service not to entertain any correspondence in English.
- Sign up for Aliran's free daily email updates or weekly newsletters or both
- Make a one-off donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB a/c 8004240948
- Make a pledge or schedule an auto donation to Aliran every month or every quarter
- Become an Aliran member
Why did Anwar embark on this policy? Was it because the civil service was being flooded with correspondences in English? Or was it because the civil servants’ English is so poor they cannot respond in English?
Did correspondences to the civil service departments cause any problem with their service delivery? Tell us what was the problem behind the change of policy.
For those who had gone through the national schools, they have no problem in corresponding in the national language. In fact, many do that!
But there are a depleting number of older people in their late seventies and eighties who had their education in English and sat for the Senior Cambridge exams. It is this diminishing, small number who have difficulty corresponding in the national language. It is these poor folks who are hard hit. There was no sympathy for or understanding of their plight. We hope Anwar will not dismiss these older people and ignore their dilemma. We pray he will be more humane than political.
This brings us to another related topic – the teaching of maths and science in English. This was allowed through the dual-language programme (DLP) that was in place. But suddenly, the education minister recently wanted at least one class for maths and science to be taught in Malay, claiming that some students in schools that implemented the DLP are not mastering basic Malay or their mother tongues.
But in the secondary Chinese schools (known as national-type secondary schools or SMJK), Malay is the medium of instruction. We are not sure what kind of survey was conducted to conclude that the students are not mastering basic Malay. How do they sit for the SPM exams and hope to pass? Their future depends on this.
Is it any wonder if students in Chinese secondary schools all opted for the DLP for maths and science? It is a natural choice for students and parents, and schools should not be punished if there is no class for maths and science to be taught in Malay. The schools cannot compel students to opt for such a class.
Obviously, it was not well thought through – before suddenly introducing this policy to compel schools to have at least one class where maths and science will be taught in Malay. When there are no takers, what do schools do? It is a dilemma for them; they are in a fix.
Unsurprisingly, on 6 June, representatives of 11 Chinese secondary schools in Penang opposed the new directive. The group said they objected to it as there were no takers for the minimum one non-DLP class. The problem faced by schools had to be highlighted in order to find a solution. That is what they did.
But this was opposed and objected to by narrow-minded ethnic Malay politicians. They claimed there was no respect and support for the Malay language and took very strong objection to the stand taken by the representatives of these Chinese schools. The stand taken by these politicians was not based on any principles of education but solely to win Malay votes in the next election.
When education is politicised, it is the country that suffers in the long run. Leaders like Anwar should not give in to these politicians. Instead, they should stand up for the good of the country and stick to policies that will help the country and the people.
With his majority support in Parliament, will Anwar be brave enough to support policies that will bring progress to the country?
AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
- Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
- Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
- Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
- Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
- Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Imagine this is imposed on international schools! Logically it makes no sense to forced it on language schools.
The same should be made for national schools eg. English classes for the sake of the nation future. As of now many are already pursuing Chinese classes/schools.