BN no longer relevant: Why race politics is losing its grip on voters

When a senior political figure, amid ongoing public speculation about the future face of Malaysia’s leadership, suggests the Constitution was “perhaps overlooked” in discussions about the prime minister’s post, it is not a simple legal observation. It is a political signal aimed at stoking unease.

This comes after 68 years of consistent political reality. The country has only had Malay-Muslim prime ministers. Ethnic Malay and bumiputra rights are protected under Article 153. Islam is the official religion. The king is Malay and Muslim. The political reality already favours the Malays.

So the question people in Malaysia must ask is simple: what exactly is being threatened?

Here, Sabah and Sarawak are the real elephant in the room.

The senior politician’s statement did not come out of nowhere. It emerged from a landscape where Umno and Barisan Nasional were largely rejected in Sabah, where BN is now reduced to a junior partner nationwide, and where East Malaysia wields true kingmaker power.

We are entering a new political reality where race politics no longer sells as easily, and where governance, fairness, autonomy and delivery matter more.

Sabah and Sarawak voters are not casting their ballots based on racial supremacy. Many of them want equality, stability, respect and genuine power-sharing. They want the autonomy promised under the Malaysia Agreement 1963.

This shift in priorities terrifies the old playbook.

Fading relevance

When fear replaces leadership, relevance fades.

There was a time when politics felt purposeful. People argued about roads, schools, jobs, security and the future their children would inherit. Leaders competed on ideas, not identities. Power was something to be earned, not locked away.

Somewhere along the way, that confidence was lost. Today, instead of asking why voters are leaving, some leaders ask how doors can be closed. Instead of reforming ideas, they try to amend eligibility. Instead of winning trust, they tighten fear. That is how relevance slips away.

In Sabah, voters stood in long lines under the sun. They were not asking whether a leader was Malay, Muslim, Christian, Chinese or Dayak.

They were asking simpler, harder questions: does this person respect us? Does this government treat us as equal partners? Does our voice matter after the election?

Their answers were clear – and painful for some in Putrajaya.

So now a new narrative appears. Suddenly, the problem is not about mis-governance, corruption, lack of credibility or poor delivery. The problem, we are told, is that the Constitution was “overlooked”.

Overlooked? For 68 years, Malaysia has had only Malay Muslim prime ministers. Malay rights are constitutionally protected. Islam is the official religion of the Federation. The monarchy is Malay and Muslim. Political power has never left Malay hands.

So what exactly is being threatened? Or is the real fear something else entirely? Perhaps the fear is not about race but about a Malaysia that is no longer afraid of it.

Sabah and Sarawak have shown us something: that diversity does not weaken governance, that equality does not destroy identity, that leadership does not need fear to survive.

For some, that example is dangerous – not to the nation, but to outdated politics. When voters stop responding to racial alarms, old tactics stop working. When people mature, fear-based politics ages rapidly. When people choose competence over identity, irrelevance becomes unavoidable.

Is this why the conversation has shifted from how to lead better to who is allowed to lead at all? Is this about ‘protecting the Malays’ – or protecting politicians who can no longer win over the people? Is this about fostering unity – or about preventing a future where leadership is judged on credibility rather than colour?

BN did not become irrelevant overnight. It became irrelevant the moment it stopped believing the people could be trusted. And perhaps the most uncomfortable question of all is this: if leadership is truly strong, fair and capable, why fear an open future?

So what’s the real fear?

Let’s be honest. The fear is not that someone from an ethnic minority background will suddenly become prime minister tomorrow.

The fear is this: what if Malaysia matures politically? What if voters stop responding to racial fear? What if East Malaysia sets a better example? What if leadership is judged by competence, not identity?

And yes – the unspoken nightmare: what if one day, the leadership comes from Sabah or Sarawak? Not because of ethnicity, but because of credibility, moderation and multiracial trust.

Why is this narrative being pushed now? Perhaps it’s because when you are losing relevance, you don’t reform. Instead, you tighten identity boundaries.

This is classic declining-power behaviour: when you can’t win hearts, you weaponise fear. When you can’t govern better, you narrow eligibility. When you can’t compete, you close doors. When you can’t inspire, you divide.

Instead of asking why young Malays are drifting away, why Sabah rejected BN, why Sarawak feels more united, or why voters are tired of racial politics, they ask, how do we lock the system further?

Slap to the federation spirit

Malaysia was formed with the peninsula, Sabah and Sarawak as equal partners – not colonies, not passengers.

Statements like the senior politician’s send a dangerous signal: that equality is conditional, that leadership is pre-reserved, that some people in Malaysia are forever ‘guests’, that loyalty is demanded but trust is never given.

You cannot ask for unity while building walls. You cannot demand loyalty while denying dignity. You cannot preach stability while stoking insecurity.

The ultimate irony

If Malaysia ever reaches a point where voters choose leaders beyond race, that is not a threat. That is success.

Strong nations don’t fear open competition. Weak politics does. If your leadership is strong, fair, and competent, you don’t need locks, racial alarms or manufactured fear. You simply win.

The final questions remain – the ones that matters. Is this about protecting the Malays – or about protecting politicians who can no longer survive without race? Is this about Islam – or insecurity dressed as religion? Is this about unity – or fear that Sabah and Sarawak’s model of equality will expose the failure of racial politics?

The people of Malaysia – Sabah and Sarawak included – are watching. Those who can read between the lines will not follow blindly.

Voters, at last, are no longer afraid.

Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps: