Home TA Online Convent Bukit Nanas: Why undermine a 122-year-old educational legacy?

Convent Bukit Nanas: Why undermine a 122-year-old educational legacy?

No amount of official justifications can dispel the misgivings of the public

Convent Bukit Nanas - cbn.edu.my

Follow us on our Malay and English WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, Tiktok and Youtube channels.

Convent Bukit Nanas, one of the oldest girls’ schools in the country, is now being forced to go to court to save the school, or at least its character and heritage.

The decision not to renew the school’s land lease, due to expire on 6 September, is baffling.

Do we not value history? Is there no more obligation towards thriving on proven legacy? Do we not respect and cherish legendary learning institutions that are iconic and have played formative roles in educating Malaysians?

Built in 1899, this is a school that has produced many of our country’s women leaders and professionals who have walked the talk in their various callings, bearing testimony to the values instilled in them in the convent.

We can preserve pre-war commercial blocks at huge cost and turn them into thriving eateries and businesses, but we do not seem able to stop land grabs that can undermine, if not bulldoze, the pride and glory of historical institutions of learning. Why?

To leave the school with no choice but to take the arduous route of seeking justice through the courts raises many ethical and value-based questions. Where is our conscience? We cannot blame concerned people from asking if there is a hidden agenda at work.

The esteemed Society of Saint Maur, which governs the well-known convent, does not deserve such punishment. For over a century, the various lady superiors from the society served – without salary, material gain or vested earthly interest – while providing effective leadership to the school. They should be revered and given all the support needed to continue leading this established institution of learning.

READ MORE:  G25 on education reforms

No amount of official justifications can dispel the misgivings of the public over the non-renewal of the lease. Why undermine the school, nestled in an enclave of greenery and rolling hills near two other legendary schools and a cathedral. Are we so blinded that we cannot see and acknowledge the glorious perspective of this segment of Bukit Nanas?

Once the convent is taken over, what is to stop the government from wanting to take over and change the character, if not demolish, other venerable schools using the same strategy?

In a climate where we face many challenges in our education system – racist decisions, the politicisation of religion, and poor educational standards – why can’t the authorities not learn to treasure the great achievements of this precious convent and let it continue contributing to nation-building as it has done for over a century?

To subject Convent Bukit Nanas to this uncertain fate, leaving it with no choice but to challenge the government’s decision in the courts, would leave another major dent to the country’s reputation.

The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
  1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
  2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
  3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
  4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
  5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Khong Kah Yeong
Khong Kah Yeong
25 Apr 2021 11.20am

This incident reminds me of two other well-known schools that had been moved from their old sites – Bukit Bintang school (KL) and the Convent school in Seremban. Both were moved on grounds of traffic congestion and “for the safety of the school children”. As far as traffic congestion is concerned I see no difference in the traffic flow in those areas at present, if at all it appears to be worse along Bukit Bintang with the presence of the shopping mall at the old site off the school. When the school was there the congestion there were periodic but now it’s the whole day long! It makes me wonder whether there were any ulterior motives in moving those schools in the first place.

Gursharan Singh
Gursharan Singh
22 Apr 2021 10.49am

Could it be that some in position of power in collusion with some in corporate sector may have an eye on this extremely high value real estate for personal bottomless greed for wealth?

Could another school land – St. John Institution be at risk of takeover in future?

Bless all

loyal malaysian
loyal malaysian
21 Apr 2021 6.26pm

The Malays will say why we ‘suka jaga tepi kain orang’?
Yet , the question need and must be asked: why change the structure of a 122 year old education institution?
Of course, if there are no ulterior motives , such a query can stand the test of time.
Dare this pengkhianat nasional govt.take the test?

3
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x