Home TA Online Hadi’s wrong advice about vote of no confidence

Hadi’s wrong advice about vote of no confidence

Image: Malaysiakini.com

Join us on Telegram and Instagram for the latest.

Muhyiddin Yassin’s appointment as PM still has to be confirmed by a majority of members of Parliament, writes Ravinder Singh

Pas president Hadi Awang wants Malaysians, especially members of Parliament, to believe that  Muhyiddin Yassin’s  appointment as Prime Minister by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong is cast in stone and therefore should not be questioned.

A local daily (The Star, 7 March 2020) reported:

He [Hadi] also advised against pushing for a vote of no confidence against the Prime Minister in Parliament as the rakyat would judge those who pushed for such a motion.

Muhyiddin was appointed as an interim prime minister. His appointment is not final and beyond question. The letter of appointment made this clear, as according to the Constitution, the king “shall… appoint a member of the House of Representatives who in his judgment is likely to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the House”.

For Hadi’s benefit, in Malay, Article 43(2)(a) states: “Yang di-Pertuan Agong hendaklah terlebih dahulu melantik sebagai Perdana Menteri untuk mempengerusikan Jemaah Menteri seorang ahli Dewan Rakyat yang pada hematnya mungkin mendapat kepercayaan majoriti ahli Dewan Rakyat.”

The Agong’s appointment is therefore interim and needs to be confirmed by a majority of the members of the House. The king, contrary to what Hadi wants people to believe, would actually be relieved (akan berasa lega) when a vote of confidence is taken, whichever way it goes.

The politicians, Hadi included, created a difficult situation for the Agong. Unlike in an election, where voters give a majority to a particular party, which then presents its PM candidate to the Agong, the candidate this time was chosen by horse-trading, which has not yet ended.

READ MORE:  Adakan sidang Parlimen segera untuk usul undi percaya (Malay/English)

The Agong had to appoint someone as he could not leave the country running on autopilot without a head. So he appointed Muhyiddin, who he believed had majority support at the time, with a silent proviso that the appointment is subject to confirmation by the House. Hadi should not use his “religious” standing to mislead people about this. 

If nearing the sitting of Parliament, Hadi feels that a vote of confidence might go against Muhyiddin, should we then be surprised if he ‘upgrades’ his caution to say that it is a sin to vote against the PM appointed by the Agong and those who do so would be judged by God? 

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x