Najib, justice and the uneven weight of the law

Joseph Masilamany

Malaysia has crossed a historic threshold.

On 26 December, the High Court convicted and sentenced Najib Razak to 15 years’ imprisonment and imposed a record RM11.4bn fine plus a RM2.1bn asset recovery order in the 1MDB case. A former prime minister now bears the heaviest judicial sanction ever imposed on a leader of this nation.

This is not a moment for triumphalism. It is a moment that deserves sobriety, reflection and honesty.

For the first time since independence, a man who once stood at the pinnacle of Malaysian political power has been convicted, imprisoned and sentenced for crimes committed while in office. For a second time.

This alone marks a rupture in our political culture – one that long believed senior leaders were shielded by status, legacy or expediency. That illusion has been badly shaken.

Najib was not convicted by public anger, social media outrage, or political vendetta. He was convicted by courts of law after long, contested trials, with representation by senior counsel, under intense national and international scrutiny.

The offences – abuse of power and money laundering involving billions of ringgit -were not technical lapses or administrative oversights. They went to the heart of fiduciary responsibility.

As then Prime Minister and finance minister, Najib held unprecedented authority over public funds. That authority came with a moral and constitutional obligation to act as a steward, not a beneficiary. The court has found that this obligation was breached.

Whatever sympathy one may feel for the man today, the gravity of that failure cannot be minimised. And yet, justice is not measured by punishment alone. It is measured by credibility.

This is where unease creeps in – not as denial of Najib’s guilt, but as a broader anxiety about the system that produced him and outlived him.

Across the country, many are asking uncomfortable but legitimate questions.

Why does accountability appear to fall most heavily on one individual, while others implicated in major scandals receive discharges not amounting to acquittal, see charges withdrawn, or quietly re-enter political life?

Why do some cases advance slowly but surely, while others languish in procedural limbo until public attention fades?

These questions do not exonerate Najib. But they do expose a deeper wound: the persistent perception that justice in Malaysia is uneven – negotiated behind closed doors, influenced by political alignment, or constrained by power rather than principle.

A legal system does not lose legitimacy because it convicts a powerful man. It loses legitimacy when conviction appears selective.

Holding two truths at once

It is possible – indeed necessary – to hold two truths at once. Najib deserves judgment for crimes proven beyond a reasonable doubt. At the same time, the rule of law is weakened when accountability stops at an intermediate level of power.

Justice cannot merely punish the most visible offender while sparing those who are politically useful, strategically inconvenient or institutionally protected.

This tension explains the contradictory emotions now visible in the public sphere.

There is anger – because 1MDB was not an abstract financial scandal. It was felt in the rising cost of living, the introduction of the goods and services tax (GST) and shrinking public trust. It meant the humiliation of seeing Malaysia’s name dragged across global headlines.

For many, Najib became the embodiment of elite impunity at a time when ordinary people were asked to tighten their belts.

There is also, surprisingly, pity. Power is fleeting. A man who once commanded the nation now navigates prison corridors. Age, health concerns and isolation soften even the hardest judgments. This is not moral weakness; it is human instinct.

And there is something else: discomfort. A sense that justice, though finally asserting itself, remains incomplete.

Pity for Najib the man does not absolve Najib the office-holder. Compassion does not require amnesia. But neither should condemnation descend into humiliation, mockery or mob vengeance.

A mature democracy punishes firmly but humanely, remembering that dignity is not a reward for innocence but a baseline of civilisation.

Malaysia must resist the temptation of turning this into a spectacle – a morality play with a single villain and a comforting ending.

1MDB was not the work of one man alone, nor was it sustained in isolation. It thrived in an ecosystem of silence, complicity, fear and political calculation. To pretend otherwise is to invite repetition.

The danger now is complacency. That Najib’s imprisonment becomes a convenient closing chapter – proof enough that the system works – while deeper reforms stall. That institutional weaknesses are masked by one dramatic conviction. That public anger is soothed without being answered.

Justice should not merely punish the fallen. It should restrain the powerful who remain standing.

This moment, therefore, calls for courage – not the courage to be harsh, but the courage to be consistent. The courage to allow investigations to proceed without political interference. The courage to accept outcomes even when they are inconvenient. The courage to ensure that discharges do not become quiet absolutions, and that the law does not bend differently for friends and foes.

Malaysia does not need martyrs, villains or political theatre. It needs closure that is honest, not cosmetic. It needs consistency that outlives governments. It needs a justice system that inspires trust, not because it is feared, but because it is fair.

Najib’s fall is historic. But history will judge us not only by how we dealt with one former prime minister. It will judge us by whether this reckoning marked a turning point or merely a pause.

Only when justice becomes a standard applied without fear or favour, rather than a moment applied to one man, can this long and painful chapter truly begin to close.

Joseph Masilamany is a journalist based in Borneo. He writes on culture, faith and societal change, exploring ethical questions and the moral dimensions of public life across Malaysia and the region.

Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps: