Our throwaway economy is a ticking financial time bomb

Ahmad Ibrahim

There is worldwide consensus on the need to sustain the global economy. The old economic model is under pressure to change.

We have long been told the story of progress as a straight line: extract, produce, consume, discard. This linear economic model built our modern world.

But a landmark report from the Circle Economy Foundation pulls no punches in revealing it for what it now is: a systemic threat to both planetary stability and economic resilience.

The findings are a stark indictment of a “take-make-dispose” system that is not just ecologically reckless, but financially short-sighted.

The ecological catastrophes are the visible symptoms: the plastic choking our oceans, the degraded soils, the poisoned air.

As the report underscores, this model treats infinite resources as a given and infinite waste sinks as a right, sacrificing the very ecosystem services our economies are built upon. The plastic crisis is not an anomaly but the logical endpoint of the single-use mentality.

The economic reckoning

It is the economic diagnosis, though, that should send shivers down the spine of every CEO, investor and policymaker.

Circle Economy’s analysis reveals a system riddled with profound vulnerabilities.

The first concerns the rollercoaster of raw materials. According to the report, we have entered an era of extreme price volatility. Since 2006, raw material prices have not only risen, they’ve become wildly unpredictable.

This isn’t just a cost issue but a strategic paralysis. How can a business plan, invest or compete globally when it unable to forecast the cost of its most basic inputs? The linear model, with its hunger for virgin resources, leaves companies permanently exposed to these wild shocks.

The second vulnerability is about betting the future on critical materials. Our high-tech achievements, from smartphones to electric vehicles, rest on a fragile foundation of scarce, “critical” materials like indium and cobalt.

The linear economy consumes these finite resources in products designed for the dump, locking entire industries into a geopolitically charged scramble for the last reserves. It is the opposite of supply chain security: it is supply chain roulette.

Then there is the domino effect of interdependence. Globalisation has woven a hyper-connected web of resource dependencies. A drought in one region does not just affect grain prices. It ricochets through the system, affecting energy, metals and manufactured goods.

Tighten the linear economy’s relentless demand for virgin materials and these stress points tighten further. A shortage or conflict anywhere can trigger cascading failures everywhere.

A design flaw

Finally, there is the unsustainable demand engine. Just as supply risks peak, the linear model is aggressively pressing down on the demand accelerator.

With an estimated three billion more middle-class consumers projected by 2030 and products designed for ever-shorter lifespans, we face a consumption explosion fuelled by a dwindling supply.

This is not growth but a bubble, and the report makes it clear that it is poised to burst.

The Circle Economy report ultimately frames this not as an ecological problem with an economic component, but as a fundamental economic design flaw.

The linear economy externalises its true costs to the ecosystem, to future generations and to market stability. It passes off resource depletion as efficiency, and treats resilience as an afterthought.

The conclusion is inescapable: clinging to the linear model is the greatest risk of all.

The circular economy – built on principles of designing out waste, keeping materials in use and regenerating natural systems – Is no longer a “green ideal”. It is the blueprint for decoupling growth from resource extraction, insulating economies from volatility and building durable competitive advantage.

The report is not just a warning but a financial case for necessity. The transition to a circular model is the only prudent business strategy left.

The linear economy’s bill has come due. And as Circle Economy makes it abundantly clear, we are unable to afford it. That is why the world is actively transitioning away from the linear economic model.

What comes next

As with the transition away from fossil fuels, there will be casualties. But the world has no choice if sustainable development remains a critical global agenda.

The government is a key player. New rules for business and procurement will have to be enacted.

Industry must play its part by embracing new business models, including extended producer responsibility, product-as-a-service schemes and digital product passports, to name just a few.

But more importantly, consumers must be drawn in to this new economic model.

The planet is waiting.

Professor Dato Ahmad Ibrahim is affiliated with the Tan Sri Omar Centre for STI Policy Studies at UCSI University. He is also an adjunct professor at the Ungku Aziz Centre for Development Studies, University of Malaya.

Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps: