Home TA Online 2010 TA Online TV2 Bakun docu-series terminated: What they didn’t want you to know

TV2 Bakun docu-series terminated: What they didn’t want you to know

Follow us on our Malay and English WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, Tiktok and Youtube channels.

A nine-part TV2 Mandarin documentary series which was to be aired from 26 April to 7 May was forced off the air on 28 April. What didn’t they want us to see? Our correspondent provides some clues. 


The documentary series was supposed to report on the social impact faced by more than 10,000 natives of the Belaga area who were forcibly relocated to Sungai Asap and Sungai Koyan area in 1998 to make way for the controversial Bakun Dam. Two episodes of this documentary were aired on 26 and 27 April before the series was yanked off.

Chou Z Lam, the producer of the documentary, revealed in a blog post that this was another instance of news interference by the BN government during and after the Hulu Selangor by election. He was told that some  “sensitive elements” in the documentary could be harmful to the coming Sibu by-election and the Sarawak state election.

Chou felt sorry for the people of Sungai Asap whom he had interviewed, for their problems and voices could not be heard now by the people of east and west Malaysia.

And what are some of the problems faced by those forced to relocate? Our correspondent reports:

The resettlers were allocated 3 acres (1.25 ha) per family which signed up for an apartment. Moreover, they were charged for the 3 acres at a premium of RM900 per acre; in comparison, the grant of leases to timber companies to establish oil palm plantations in the area was at a premium of RM600 per ha, i.e, about RM250 per acre.

READ MORE:  New book: Scholar activist Khoo Khay Jin - Reflections on the Penan, Sarawak and Malaysia

It was clear that this was planned poverty. At the time of the resettlement planning in 1996, 3 acres of oil palm could not bring in a household income above the poverty line for a family of five. Even today, at RM500 per tonne of oil palm fruit, 3 acres can only bring in, at best, a gross income of RM10,000 a year. This is a net income of around RM7,000 a year, or about RM580 a month. The Mid-Term Review of the Ninth Malaysia Plan gave a poverty line income of RM830 a month for Sarawak.

Given this basic fact, is it any surprise that the documentary is not being allowed?

Urban people in Sarawak have only heard about the allegedly large sums of compensation given to the people affected by Bakun. What they do not realise is that while some people did get large sums, most didn’t. Moreover, the government held back the compensation due to them for their lost homes — as a means of forcing them to pay for the resettlement housing. From the very beginning, people have been unhappy about the quality and size of the resettlement housing. For most of them, their previous homes were much larger, and made of better material.

In addition, no concession was made in giving them preferential rates for electricity, or even an allowance of free electricity. They have only enjoyed the same concession granted in the past year as everyone else. As a result, after a short while, the Penan, the poorest of all the resettlers, had their electricity cut off when they could not afford to pay, and have had to live with no electricity for most of the past 12 years.

READ MORE:  Malaysian activists hold symbolic tribunal investigating deforestation

Imagine: a people who sacrifice their ancestral lands and homes for a hydroelectric dam living without electricity because they cannot afford to pay the high tariffs charged by the Sarawak electricity company, when one day of the previous Sarawak Energy Bhd’s CEO’s remuneration of RM1.3 million a year would have paid for all of the Penan’s electricity consumption for one year! The previous SEB CEO was not only the a former State Secretary, but also the brother-in-law of the Chief Minister.

1Malaysia? Rakyat diutamakan?

In this context, take the time to read Abun Sui Anyit’s heart-felt lament for Belaga and for his people here.

Stay connected, current and committed to justice. We deliver the truth right to your doorstep every month for only RM30 a year — which is far less than your newspaper bill each month. All you have to do is click here.

Justice was never won without personal sacrifice – whether measured in time volunteered, energy devoted to a cause, or financial support generously given. We need your support in our struggle for justice. Your contribution no matter how small will be like a droplet that builds up into a wave of change. Click here if you would like to contribute financially.

The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
  1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
  2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
  3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
  4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
  5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps:
Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Watch Dog says...
11 Apr 2011 9.42pm

This is the politics of CORRUPTION …. The people of Belaga are given RAW deals with land premium at RM900 per acre while (connected parties) pay only RM250.00 per acre.Is this what you call justice??

Belaga voters..if you VOTE for BN = vote for Taib.


Anak Jepang
Anak Jepang
5 Apr 2011 1.16pm

Whether it is Rocky Bru or Mat Talib’s blog, all pointed to poverty in Sarawak as if its is phenomenal. Sarawakian have never raised the question like why the Highways from Penang to Johore are double/triple lane and developments emphahis is o much in Peninsular Malaysia? It ias definitely some of these monies could have been used to lower the poverty level in Sarawak and emphasis given to better infra structures in the this Oil & Gas rich state.
Thus, I suport the exuistence of Borneo United Front to fight for the rights of all in Sarawak and Sabah. We do not lament poverty level as an issue, but we want fairness in the nation’s development game. Ironically, when election come, suddenly Sarawak or Sabah is important, otherwise it takes the back seat.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x