Why marginalised students still struggle to access higher education in Malaysia

Ahmad Ibrahim

Higher education in Malaysia has long been regarded as a vehicle for social mobility and national development.

Yet, persistent inequalities in access and participation among marginalised groups, particularly those from rural, indigenous and lower-income communities, remain a challenge.

The late Royal Professor Ungku Abdul Aziz’s legacy as a visionary educator and social reformer offers valuable guidance in addressing this inequity.

His lifelong advocacy for inclusive, locally relevant and people-centred education frameworks is especially relevant in the face of contemporary challenges.

This article proposes a multi-dimensional policy strategy to rethink higher education access and delivery for marginalised communities in Malaysia.

It focuses on policy reform, curriculum redesign, community-based models, and digital democratisation. Through these approaches, Malaysia can uphold Ungku Aziz’s ideals while future-proofing its education system in an increasingly volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous world.

Royal Professor Ungku Aziz was a towering figure in Malaysian education history, remembered for his work in poverty eradication, rural development and people-centric economic policies.

As vice-chancellor of the University of Malaya and an economist, he championed higher education to uplift marginalised communities and bridge socioeconomic divides.

Today, access to quality higher education for marginalised groups remains uneven.

Despite Malaysia’s commendable tertiary enrolment rates, students from rural areas, indigenous groups, Orang Asli communities and low-income families still struggle. They face obstacles including financial limitations, geographical distance, rigid admissions criteria and curricula that often overlook local socioeconomic realities.

The rapidly evolving global economy, driven by the fourth industrial revolution, climate change and digital transformation, further worsens these disparities.

Without deliberate policy intervention, marginalised communities risk being left behind. This would perpetuate unhealthy cycles of poverty and exclusion.

There are some key issues. Marginalised communities face limited access to higher education because of financial constraints, remote locations and lack of infrastructure.

Traditional admission criteria and campus-based learning models often exclude non-traditional learners, adult students and those with experiential knowledge.

There are signs though that this is changing, though. Mainstream higher education curricula frequently fail to address the unique socioeconomic needs and local knowledge systems of marginalised communities.

Despite the potential of digital technology to democratise education, digital infrastructure and affordable access remain unevenly distributed.

The rising costs of higher education, coupled with limited scholarship opportunities for the marginalised, restrict opportunities for upward mobility.

Some strategies have been proposed along the lines of thinking espoused by Ungku Aziz.

First, develop a national higher education inclusion blueprint that prioritises access for marginalised groups. Hopefully, this will be featured in the soon-to-be-launched new higher education blueprint.

The framework should mandate flexible admission criteria for students from underserved communities. It should expand the use of recognition of prior experiential learning to acknowledge informal and community-based learning, It should also set proactive enrolment targets for students from rural, indigenous and low-income communities.

Second, universities should revamp higher education curricula to reflect the needs of local communities and the informal economy. Universities should introduce micro-credentials in areas like sustainable agriculture, eco-tourism, rural entrepreneurship and digital skills.

They should also embed community-based research and service-learning projects into degree programmes, and integrate ‘people’s knowledge’ modules inspired by Ungku Aziz’s advocacy for indigenous and community wisdom.

Third, Malaysia should harness digital platforms to deliver accessible, affordable and scalable education. One way is to establish a national open university platform offering free or low-cost accredited online programmes. The government should collaborate with telecoms companies to provide zero-rated internet access for educational platforms in rural areas. It should also develop offline, low-bandwidth learning tools and mobile university units for remote communities.

Fourth, the country should expand financial aid and innovative funding models to remove financial barriers. Some suggestions include scaling up micro-scholarships and targeted grants for marginalised students. Others include introducing work-study programmes within universities, particularly in community development and sustainability projects. The country could also create a higher education social fund through corporate contributions under environmental, social and governance obligations.

Fifth, Malaysia should establish university satellite campuses, mobile education hubs and community learning centres in underserved areas. It should launch university-community living labs to co-create localised solutions for community challenges. Universities should offer part-time, evening and weekend programmes for working adults and informal workers. They should also partner with NGOs and local authorities to manage community-based education initiatives.

Upholding Ungku Abdul Aziz’s enduring legacy requires a bold reimagining of Malaysia’s higher education system.

It demands an education policy that is inclusive, context-sensitive and people-centric. This policy must acknowledge the diverse realities of marginalised communities while equipping them for a complex, digital and climate-conscious future.

Through multi-dimensional strategies encompassing policy reform, curriculum innovation, digital democratisation, financial empowerment and community-based outreach, Malaysia can reaffirm higher education as a national instrument for social justice and sustainable development.

By embedding Ungku Aziz’s ideals into contemporary education policy, Malaysia not only honours a national icon but takes a decisive step toward a fairer, more inclusive society.

Professor Dato Ahmad Ibrahim is affiliated with the Tan Sri Omar Centre for STI Policy Studies at UCSI University and is an adjunct professor at the Ungku Aziz Centre for Development Studies, University of Malaya.

Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps: