Why we keep destroying ourselves even when we know better

M Nadarajah

There is a quiet tragedy unfolding in our era. Directly or indirectly, you and I are responsible for our own destruction.

Despite hundreds of committees, thousands of research papers and reports, and numerous universities and programmes, global statistics on ecological collapse, arms sales, mindless material consumption, conflicts and genocide, biodiversity loss and the climate emergency have reached alarming levels. The future for the next generation looks bleak.

We possess more knowledge than any previous generation, yet we seem unable to act on it. Despite the fires, floods, wars and genocides surrounding our world, we continue drifting, tethered to numbness, comfort and distraction.

The SBC syndrome

This paralysis is not merely a failure of policy or intelligence. It stems from a deeper cultural pattern: an interlocked triad that sustains our collective inertia and even participation in our own destruction. This is the SBC syndrome – stupidity, banality and complicity.

These are not insults to individuals but forces at work within our consciousness in our unquestioned social life, shaping how we think, feel, act and live.

We live amid an eco-social, moral and spiritual crisis. Yet the collective behaviour of individuals and major institutions, including educational ones, appears to simply perpetuate what causes the crisis. Through the SBC syndrome, we are sadly poised to destroy ourselves.

A syndrome is a cluster of signs and symptoms that reliably occur together, defining a specific condition. Stupidity, banality and complicity form not three isolated traits but a mutually reinforcing structure that reproduces the polycrisis in late neoliberal capitalism while creating the illusion that everything is fine.

Stupidity concerns consciousness: not mere lack of intelligence, but a refusal or trained inability to think truthfully and independently.

Banality concerns behaviour: the daily, routinised, often emotionless carrying out of harmful actions without deep moral reflection.

Complicity concerns involvement: being entangled in and mindlessly reproducing harm, even without malicious intent.

Together, they form a cultural complex that explains why people who know better keep doing worse, and why humanity can foresee its own destruction but is unable to collectively stop it.

The will to stupidity

Stupidity, in its most perilous form, is not about IQ or ignorance but surrender. It is the blindness and inability to recognise what is before us. It involves turning away from the truth when it conflicts with hedonistic consumerism and convenience.

Even highly intelligent people can fall into this trap when their moral compass becomes subordinate to external authority: the market, the state or the ideology of “progress”.

This “will to stupidity” dulls the capacity for independent thought, cloaking consciousness in the comfort of slogans and the reassurance of consensus.

We now live in a vast machinery of distraction that prevents the mind and heart from authentic thinking and feeling. This machine thrives on noise – headlines, images, trends and alluring narratives – all designed to seize attention while stripping away meaning.

History is forgotten, connections are obscured, and impossible ideas are accepted as common sense. We become clever without wisdom and informed without understanding. We repeat stories without questioning them.

Stupidity then becomes not the absence of thought, but the replacement of thinking with numbing repetition that serves dominant power.

The banality of evil

When stupidity blinds, banality rules the uncritical everydayness of our lives. Bureaucratic procedures, institutions and algorithms execute the unthinkable – not out of hatred, but from repetitive, unthinking, unfelt indifference.

“Evil” today often wears the guise of normalcy – the teacher, the project manager, the analyst, the official, the doctor, each faithfully playing a role, each shifting harm from human eyes into data points and procedures. Evil is normalised and reified and made acceptable as “that’s the way it is”.

We simply go along with the mundane flow of the many destructive streams of everyday life as parents, teachers, students, professors and politicians. As professionals, we just carry out harmful tasks. As consumers, we support and nurture destructive consumption.

After all, the harm is not visible. The victims are not here and now.

As our systems become more complex, it becomes easier to hide moral failure behind efficiency. The spreadsheet and algorithm appear neutral, but they are extensions of an ethic that has set aside conscience.

In this world, the question “Is this right?” is replaced by “Does this comply?” or “Will this maximise returns?” The moral core of life diminishes into performance metrics.

Banality thrives through separation – separating means from ends, actions from consequences, humans from one another.

The harm we inflict no longer registers as harm because it occurs elsewhere: on another continent, in a different species, in a future generation we do not witness.

And so, we carry on, efficiently doing what is unethical and destroying what sustains us.

Complicity and silence

Complicity is the social glue of injustice – the silent participation of the majority that allows harm to become normalised.

It is not always born of malice. More often, it is the gentle surrender to the patterns of everyday life: our consumption, our comfort, our obedience to “how things are”.

When everyone depends on the system that destroys, resistance feels like self-destruction. We feel resistance would be stupid. We are told to be practical.

This is why we often dwell among open secrets. We know the planet burns, that inequality wounds, that lives are wasted in the service of capital and in mindless wars.

Yet our conversations remain curiously polished. We reinvent language to remove discomfort. We talk of unjust killing as “collateral damage”. We talk of “sustainability” while clinging to lives that thrive on unsustainability. We cultivate silence to maintain convenience and a sense of belonging.

The cost of truth becomes too great, and so we choose amnesia.

Consumerism deepens this pattern by privatising responsibility. It tells us to solve systemic collapse through better purchases: recycled notebooks, ethical coffee and electric cars. Such gestures soothe guilt but leave the logic of destruction untouched.

Meanwhile, fatigue sets in, and despair grows quiet. We retreat into isolation, convinced that personal virtue can replace collective transformation.

The emotional landscape

To live within this triad is to inhabit a field of contradictions – anxious yet numb, informed yet powerless, connected yet profoundly alone. The chaos of the world presses upon us.

Yet the culture instructs us to manage anxiety privately: breathe, meditate, medicate. The message is clear – heal the symptom, not the system.

This privatisation of distress fragments our capacity for solidarity. When everything is pathologised – burnout, fear, grief – the political roots of pain are obscured.

And yet, our bodies know. Somewhere within, we carry the grief of a planet unravelling, even when our minds refuse to name it. Beneath the numbness lies a yearning for meaning – the faint pulse of something unforgotten.

Perhaps this emotional exhaustion is not weakness but a sign of dissonance – the soul’s protest against a world out of tune with life.

The task is not to suppress this ache but to listen to it – for our numbness may be the veil that grief wears before awakening.

Breaking the trance

The SBC triad is certainly not our destiny. It is an interlocking maze of stupidity, banality and complicity that feels insurmountable.

But we urgently need to get out. We need a vantage point from which to challenge it.

Every pattern of destruction and ‘social death’ holds the potential for rebirth.

To break the trance, we must start by reclaiming the one faculty the system fears most: the ability to imagine differently.

Imagination does not mean escape but remembrance – recalling our place within life, our fragility and our capacity to care. It involves seeing beyond the illusions of comfort, convenience and progress. It requires us to reclaim the power to suffer and sacrifice, the silent courage to resist, the quiet intelligence of compassion.

This marks the beginning of a regenerative culture, one that measures growth not by accumulation but by reclaiming and restoration, not by speed but by depth.

To live regeneratively is to practise refusal and renewal: rejecting the numbing habits that divide us and renewing our capacity for dialogue, community and reverence for the living world.

We break the triad not through blind rage but through prophetic anger and awakening – recognising that what destroys the world first destroys our own capacity to feel.

The work before us is not simply to resist systems, but to become whole again — to act as citizens of life rather than subjects of inertia.

In this profound shift, the undoing of stupidity, the disarming of banality and the unbinding of complicity begin.

In their place may grow something rarer – a collective intelligence of the heart, capable of compassion, courage and truth.

Dr M Nadarajah is a sociologist whose work focuses on sustainability, regeneration and culture. He is an associate director at Sejahtera Leadership Initiative and Global Sejahtera (Malaysia) and is involved in educational initiatives at the Centre for Constitutional Values and Dialogical Democracy at Loyola College in Trivandrum, India.

Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps: