Home Web Specials 2014 Web Specials Discretion of the monarch in choice of MB

Discretion of the monarch in choice of MB

Follow us on our Malay and English WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, Tiktok and Youtube channels.

The golden rule “is not to draw the monarch into controversy or political negotiations”, says Gurdial Singh Nijar.

wan azizah

The Selangor menteri besar imbroglio has been decisively solved by His Royal Highness, but only partially – with the resignation of the incumbent MB.

Resignation of the MB implies as well the resignation of the entire executive committee.

The question of dissolving the Selangor assembly and calling for snap elections is no longer a live issue.

All that remains now is for the sultan to appoint a new MB.

His Highness has requested for each component party of PR to supply more than two nominees from PR for consideration. This means three names in total.

The statement from the palace clarifies that this is based on existing conventional practice.

The Selangor Constitution mirrors identical provisions of the Federal Constitution.

The Federal Constitution is based on the UK Westminster model. Hence it may be instructive to reflect on the practice that obtains in UK in the choice of a Prime Minister when the existing PM resigns.

Then, say constitutional authorities of repute (Turpin & Tomkins, British Government and the Constitution, 2011):

In reality, the Queen’s prerogative is governed by the fundamental constitutional convention grounded in political necessity, that she must appoint as PM the man or woman who can form a government which will have the confidence of the House.

Normally this convention clearly indicates the party leader who, having majority support in the House, has an indisputable claim to beappointed.

In cases where parties have their own arrangement or procedures for electing a successor, “there is no room for the exercise of discretion by the Queen”.

READ MORE:  Pilihan raya negeri: Panglima PN Selangor Azmin mampu robek PH?

The golden rule “is not to draw the monarch into controversy or political negotiations”.

On the exercise of discretion by the Perak Sultan, the Federal Court in the Perak MB case (Nizar v Zambry) said:

His Royal Highness must appoint someone who has the command and confidence of the majority of the members of the Legislative Assembly.

In the present case, there is no doubt that Zambry has the majority support of the members of the Legislative Assembly. He has the support of 31 members from 59 members of the Legislative Assembly.

The Selangor Constitution provides for a reference to the Federal Court for its opinion any question as to the effect of any provision of the Constitution which has arisen or appears to Him to be likely to arise: Article 95(2).

The reference is to be made by His Highness. – August 26, 2014.

Gurdial Singh Nijar is a professor in the law faculty of the University of Malaya.

Source: themalaysianinsider.com

The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
  1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
  2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
  3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
  4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
  5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps:
Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
28 Aug 2014 12.52pm

Might as well not have any election, just get the Sultan of each respective state to appoint the MB for the state, end of the story and end of any chaos, period.

Ed G
Ed G
28 Aug 2014 10.00am

MB Khalid initiated the action of dragging HRH Sultan of Selangor into his own political mess by seeking the consent (or support?) for the continuing of his tenure as MB with his fallacious claim of majority support. And why … need a list of nominees shortlisted by each PR component party to select from? What would be the basis of … selection? What would be the implication if the one selected do not command the majority support? Under such a circumstance, would the MB imbroglio be further prolonged?

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x