By kidding itself, the government risks overlooking the actual problems of low wages, high cost of living, high indebtedness among Malaysians and income inequality, says Steven Sim.
People say politicians often tell lies. But really more often than not, they actually give us statistics. What is the difference? I’ll let Mark Twain tell you: “There are three kinds of lies; lies, damned lies and statistics”.
The latest statistics our government proudly brandish at us is the report that household income in Malaysia has surpassed RM5,900 a month. This was presented by Datuk Seri Abdul Wahid Omar, the former boss of Maybank roped into the Cabinet as ‘Economy Minister’.
Intuitively, most Malaysians know it’s a farce. Why?
Because many families we know, maybe including our own, earn much less than RM5,900 a month.
- Sign up for Aliran's free daily email updates or weekly newsletters or both
- Make a one-off donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB a/c 8004240948
- Make a pledge or schedule an auto donation to Aliran every month or every quarter
- Become an Aliran member
Because even the government itself proudly claimed that its cash transfer programme BR1M has benefited 80 per cent of Malaysian households. The only condition for BR1M is that a recipient household must earn less than RM3,000 a month.
Because as recent as September of 2013, the government said that 82.5 per cent of young Malaysians below the age of 30 earn below RM3,000 a month. These constitute more than one third of the workers in Malaysia.
Because according to the 2012 Household Income and Basic Amenities Survey (HIS/BA 2012), the bottom 40 per cent of Malaysian households only earn about RM1,800 per month.
Additionally, while the HIS/BA 2012 already noted that the average Malaysian household earns RM5,000 a month, 50 per cent of Malaysian households actually earn less than RM3,626 monthly.
How did that happened?
Statistics, the art of telling official “lies”
(Caveat: I love statistics because if used responsibly, they provide useful insights into reality)
The Economy Minister used the latest HIS/BA 2014 which has yet to be published by the Department of Statistics on its website. Hence, I will use the HIS/BA 2012 to illustrate how he has cleverly used statistics to paint a rosy picture of our earnings.
Abdul Wahid used mean household income to demonstrate that we are already earning RM5,900 a month. In the HIS/BA 2012, as mentioned above, the mean household income was already RM5,000 a month. This was basically arrived at by averaging the total income of all households with the total number of households.
As we all know, an average works well if the data set is symmetry, i.e. if everyone has roughly the same salary in this case. Otherwise, one or two greater values in the set will significantly skew the average from the other values. We may just add a local twist to the famous anecdote: Bill Gates entering into a workmen’s bar, immediately turns everyone into a millionaire, if a Minister like Abdul Wahid comes in to take an income survey and presented the mean income of the bar patrons.
On the other hand, the HIS/BA 2012 also reported that the median household income in Malaysia was only RM3,626. Median gives a better picture of an asymmetrical set of data, that is, a set with values which differ greatly from one another. It divides the set equally into two parts above and below the median value. Thus according to the HIS/BA 2012, 50 per cent of Malaysian households actually earn less than RM3,626 monthly although the average income is RM5,000 a month.
Both are valid statistical outputs, so what is the problem?
If you ask me, the problem with such “dishonesty” is not much about the government lying to us but rather the government lying to itself. By patting its own back on the so-called achievement, the government created a false sense of its own success; it thus risks ignoring the real situation and the work that still needs to be done.
During my first parliamentary sitting in 2013, the self-same Economy Minister proudly told the House that because our country’s unemployment rate is below 4 per cent, according to economist John Maynard Keynes, we can be deemed to have full employment.
Since then, I have been pointing out that such a self-congratulatory perspective continues to blind the government towards the real condition of employment in this country, ranging from high unemployment among young Malaysians including graduates to the issue of underemployment, from unfair industrial practices to gender discrimination in the job market, from our over-dependence on low-skilled migrant labour to brain drain.
Similarly, when someone the stature of the Economy Minister says we are already earning RM5,900 a month, the government risks overlooking the actual problems of low wages, high cost of living, high indebtedness among Malaysians and income inequality.
Even with all the reports showing economic growth, we have failed in the last 20 years to achieve any significant improvement to close the gap on inequality. According to Second Finance Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Husni, Malaysia’s Gini Coefficient Index, which measures inequality (0 means perfect equality, 1 means perfect inequality), was 0.431 in 2012, one of the highest in the region, compared to countries such as Thailand 0.4 and Indonesia 0.37.
Thus, the problem about telling lies is not that others will be convinced but rather the one telling the lies might believe his own lies.
Steven Sim is the Member of Parliament for Bukit Mertajam
AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
- Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
- Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
- Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
- Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
- Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
I served the government for 30 odd years ad retired at superscale C. My retirement emolument is RM 5300. If RM5900 is the mean income I am in the poverty group. I wonder how many retirees, government or otherwise must be in this poverty category.
After all the lies, the nation will become bankrupt as $ in corrupt pockets………….
I have always maintained, even as recent as just a few days ago, that figures and statics provided by the dorkys from Umno are not to be taken with a pinch of salt. These are especially so when they were and are provided by the repugnant … Mahathir. Take for example the census board of Malaysia came up with the figures that the muslim Malays with the population of nearly 60% are the majority in Malaysia. These (make up?) figures would then legitimize all his pro muslim Malays’ policies in the country. Most important of all the marginalisation of the (minorities). He went beyond that when the country’s civil servants are 94% of the total work force… The police … came up with the excuse that the (minorities), especially the Chinese, do not like to be seen in the uniform of the police force. If that is true, why is it then so many thousands of Chinese are in the police force in Singapore ? Just how many Chinese or (minorities) are in the top 15 posts in the police force or in Bukit Aman ?… Read more »