Home Web Specials 2015 Web Specials Media and religious extremism

Media and religious extremism

Militants from the Islamic State - Photograph: presstv.ir

Follow us on our Malay and English WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, Tiktok and Youtube channels.

It is only through giving voices to more people, even to those with whom media workers don’t agree, that religious extremism can be better moderated, writes Nicholas Chan.

Iman Research (a research outfit of which I am part) recently launched our maiden event with the partnership of The Habibie Centre, Usaid and The Malaysian Insider in the form of a roundtable and public forum to discuss the media’s role in countering religious extremism.

Due to the pervasive threat of religious extremism in many forms, from Isis to religious zealots in Malaysia to Burma’s state-sponsored violence against Muslims, the topic generated a lively discourse. That said, the greatest takeaway from the event remained that the topic deserves greater and deeper interrogation.

To begin with, the media (in this case, the news media) and extremism enjoy an intricate relationship. Historically, the media has not only served as the reporter of extremist acts and ideologies (the US media did not shy away from reporting Hitler’s atrocities), but unfortunately also ended up being easy targets of extremist acts.

In their line of duty, journalists were killed, abducted or jailed, while offices of the press were no stranger to raids and harassments, some even deadly ones.

Reporting and commenting on religion topped the risk scale, for aggressors came not only from the state but also outside it, as bloggers in Bangladesh sadly found out, slain for criticising the rise of religious militancy in the country.

On the other hand, some scholars would argue that the media actually enables terrorism by giving them a platform on which to spread messages and images of terror to strike fear into the hearts of people and publicise their causes to attract more followers.

READ MORE:  By-elections: Johoreans, you can either divide the people or unify the nation - the choice is yours!

With the coming of the internet age, the media now refers to a much broader and looser network as compared to the age of the printing press. Like any successful capitalists, terrorists now can not only formulate their own media strategies, but also execute them effectively.

Websites propagating Isis’ ideology have paraded as news portals, not to mention that the terrorist organisation has a magazine of its own that belies a rather suave and professional presentation, one must say.

Social media join the fray by atomising and multiplying media presence, which creates a formidable threat considering that 75% of Malaysian Isis militants were recruited through social media.

Understandably, there is a natural expectation of the media to counter religious extremism because the media have always been seen as the voice of conscience for society in dire times.

It is an agent of social change for some, such as Chinese nationalist Sun Yat Sen, who famously said, “One newspaper is worth a hundred thousand soldiers.”

Nevertheless, even if the general perception is that we are losing to extremists in the propaganda war, we must be careful not to jump to the conclusion that the (news) media should be made a ‘tool” in combating religious extremism.

As Jahabar Sadiq, chief executive officer of The Malaysian Insider accurately puts it, the primary role of the news media is still to report facts. Taking an active role in countering religious and violent extremism, which are arguably areas of state jurisdiction, would risk the news media losing their sacrosanct status as the fourth estate.

READ MORE:  Regular press briefings can benefit the government, media and public

Besides, it is also naive to think that the general conditions which encourage religious extremism can be reversed by the media. Among these reasons is unfulfilled spiritual needs in the modern condition, according to lecturer Ahmad El-Muhammady, which the media can only do so much to provide.

Even so, the news media can still play a useful and productive, albeit nuanced, role in countering religious extremism.

The National Violence Monitoring System (NVMS) of Indonesia, a project of the Habibie Centre, uses newspaper reports from 34 agencies in nine provinces to gather information about conflicts and political violence within the nation. This provides important data in analysis of why and where violence breaks out, and hopefully finds ways to prevent them, as highlighted by Rudi Sukandar, senior advisor to the system.

Producing documentaries to bring out the voices of the disillusioned fighters of Isis, who would not talk to the authorities for valid reasons, for example, is another way of adding to the discourse by showing the ‘caliphate’ for what it is, with injustices, insufficiencies and contradictions that propaganda fails to mention.

Even in the Malaysian context, reporting facts remains an important avenue in countering religious extremism. What can be done is that the media acquire greater religious literacy to provide a broader perspective in reporting about the Muslim community in Malaysia, so as to avoid stepping into the trappings of a ‘right’ versus ‘wrong’ Islam debate fervently guarded by liberals and conservatives, state and non-state actors alike.

For example, there is actually a movement within the Malay-speaking Muslim community to counter Wahhabi thinking in Malaysia (which has a Facebook page and interestingly, an anti-Facebook page).

READ MORE:  Defuse the trend towards extremism!

By covering this, the news media can dispel the notion held by many that Salafi-Wahhabi teachings, an ultraconservative brand of Islam many would argue is extremist, is subscribed to uncritically by Malaysian Muslims.

One should note by now that a binary position – one that is popularised by the ‘war on terror’ paradigm – is insufficient and often alienating in covering issues with regard to religion and its cultural and political praxis.

A heightened awareness of the media’s subject-position is also needed. The last thing the media would want is to be boxed into factions or slapped with labels such as ‘pro-West’ or ‘government mouthpiece’ which would deny them access to the people who need the narratives they provide, or worse, cause them to be unwillingly dragged into a Manichean worldview that diminishes the media as a neutral arbiter of truth and facts.

Ultimately, it is only through giving voices to more people, even to those with whom media workers don’t agree, that religious extremism which thrives on the idea that we are seeing a ‘clash of civilisations’ can be better moderated.

Depth has to be provided in understanding extremism, be it about the surrounding geopolitics, sociological concerns or state-induced reactions.

In doing so, the media will invariably benefit from more connections fostered with experts, activists, authorities and even those foaming at their mouth espousing hate.

Source: The Malaysian Insider


The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
  1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
  2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
  3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
  4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
  5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps:
Notify of
1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hakimi Abdul Jabar
5 Aug 2016 3.10pm

ISIS – Islamists Serial Rapists-Terrorists : Hostis Humani Generis

The UNSC Resolution 2249 (2015) offers the following salient element that among all terrorist groups constituting a major challenge on a regional or a global scale, ISIS is singled out as a ‘global and unprecedented threat to international peace and security,’ a qualification so far no terrorist group has ever been awarded.

Thus, being a “global and unprecedented” threat to international peace and security ISIS requires primary attention, it is not inconceivable that the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) group is still committing genocide and other crimes against the Yazidi minority in Iraq, as a statement by the United Nations commission investigating human rights abuses in Syria had stated on last Wednesday, 3rd. August 2016.

The predicament of many innocent victims and their families will definitely continue without the essentially effective planning of military actions by the UN Military Staff Committee in ensuring its revival from a long period of dormancy in the pursuit of individual criminal responsibility in the Joint-Criminal Enterprise (JCE) via prosecutions in an UN-sanctioned International Penal/Criminal Tribunal.




Would love your thoughts, please comment.x