Repeal Section 377

Follow us on our Malay and English WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, Tiktok and Youtube channels.

The British Raj introduced Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code which was drafted in 1860 – and it is the same Section 377 that is in the Malaysian Penal Code, points out Wandering Malaysian.

The jailing of Anwar Ibrahim for allegedly consensual sex with an adult male puts Malaysia in the spotlight for being rabidly homophobic.

Whether Anwar is guilty or innocent of this charge is not the issue here (although the tainted court process and evidence of political chicanery has put Malaysia’s entire judiciary on trial, never mind the credibility of the government).

The real question is why is consensual sex between two adults of the same sex a heinous crime in Malaysia?

To put it simply, Anwar is in jail today because of the British colonial Raj in India. The British Raj introduced Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code which was drafted in 1860!

So 155 years later, in the age of Fifty Shades of Grey, poor Anwar is being subject to the moral rectitude of the British Raj. Section 377 of Malaysia’s Penal Code, modelled after the Indian Penal Code (note the same section number!), criminalises carnal intercourse against the order of nature i.e. oral and anal sex. Yes, even oral sex between heterosexual adults.

So clearly we have an antiquated law. But how many times has this law been enforced in Malaysian history? According to Simranjit Kaur Gill, there have been a grand total of seven charges brought under this law since 1938. Four out of these seven charges were connected to Anwar! Hmmm ….do the words selective prosecution, abuse of the legal process, witch hunt and political persecution come to mind?

READ MORE:  60 NGOs applaud PM's directive to admit students unable to pay fees

What have the Indians done with their Section 377 of the Penal Code which was the fountain of the sodomy laws for the Commonwealth? Why, they repealed it of course: in 2009.

Two years earlier, Singapore modified Section 377a of their Penal Code to exclude consensual oral and anal sex (well in typical Singaporean fashion, of course). So where does that leave Malaysia?

Leaving religion out of the bedroom and with apologies to the Sharia fans out there, it is time to follow the Indians. (There has been no surge in homosexuality in India since 2009 and the right wing Hindus there are as equally worked up over sexual morality as our Malaysian Sharia advocates.)

So let us repeal Section 377….and free Anwar, taking another step towards a more inclusive Malaysia.


The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
  1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
  2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
  3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
  4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
  5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps:
Notify of
1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
15 Apr 2015 1.56am

Oral sex should be legalized at least for homosexual partners. Unlike heterosexual sex, oral sex among homosexuals is an accepted and enjoyed expression of love and affection between them. It is much like intercourse is for heteros, but it is also like kissing is for heteros. That is, it is a form of greeting, of recreation and bonding, for breaking the ice and getting to know each other’s likes and dislikes before deciding to commit further. It is so central and essential to the experience of being gay and enjoyed so very often.
Keep it illegal for heteros but make it legal for homosexuals or you should make kissing and intercourse illegal!

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x