Home Web Specials Investigating the investigative journalism of Al Jazeera

Investigating the investigative journalism of Al Jazeera

File photo: Hasnoor Hussain/Al Jazeera

Follow us on our Malay and English WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, Tiktok and Youtube channels.

It is a pity that government officials reportedly declined an invitation from this media outlet to present their case to Malaysian and international audiences, Mustafa K Anuar writes.

Six Al Jazeera employees were called in for police investigation under Malaysia’s Penal Code, Sedition Act and Communications and Multimedia Act in the wake of their 25-minute “101 East” investigative documentary, Locked Up in Malaysia’s Lockdown.

The documentary alleges there was racism and mistreatment in the detention of undocumented migrants during the enforcement of the movement control order to contain the Covid-19 pandemic.

Being accused of racism in a world shaken by the #BlackLivesMatter movement is indeed a serious matter. As a result, it sparked an uproar and earned the ire of the Malaysian authorities, who claimed that the documentary was “inaccurate, misleading and unfair”.

The reportage is generally one-sided, which caused many to accuse the broadcasting station of overly siding with the migrants, who, incidentally, are already subjected to xenophobia among Malaysians. A few Malaysians even called the documentary an attempt to “reinvent the truth about Malaysia’s lockdown”.

It is most unfortunate that the documentary is not balanced in the sense that the government’s side of the story is not presented in the report, as is expected of professional journalism.

Apart from the migrant workers, the documentary interviewed civil society organisations and trade associations. There is also a useful account of Good Samaritans among Malaysians.

It is a pity that government officials reportedly declined the invitation from the international media outlet to present their case to the Malaysian as well as international audiences. In fact, it makes viewers wonder why the Malaysian authorities did not take up the offer to tell their side of the story. This has given rise to unnecessary suspicion that something is amiss.

READ MORE:  A deficient democracy

Viewers are now deprived of their right to know the supposed reality that the government wants them to know regarding the detention episode, which can be done by employing facts and figures that it has at its disposal.

Having said that, it is not too late for the government to insist on a right of reply, which is the standard operating procedure for media organisations worth their salt. This is the platform, which Al Jazeera has already offered, to right what is considered wrong or misleading in the reportage.

If this right of reply is not utilised by the government, it would then make us wonder whether future reporting that is deemed “inaccurate, misleading and unfair” would also be subject to similar police investigation.

Al Jazeera also complained about its staff being subjected to sustained online harassment in the form of abusive messages and death threats, which is very disturbing. Journalists should not work with fear or favour.

One instead would expect public response to this reportage of Malaysia, warts and all, to be civil and intellectual in nature in a supposedly democratic society, such as by writing to Al Jazeera and the local press about how they feel about the documentary.

Civilised intellectual exchanges, no matter how different the opinions are, should be encouraged as they are legitimate and constitute freedom of expression as long as they do not incite hate and cause physical harm.

Source: themalaysianinsight.com

The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
  1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
  2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
  3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
  4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
  5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps:
Notify of
1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mᵜāz Kalīm
Mᵜāz Kalīm
26 Jul 2020 5.32pm

This comment sounds like oh-so-eloquent “both sides” to me.

It’s not AJE®’s liability if in spite of repeated questionnaires, they simply played the authority-card of

No Comment,

other than the hooliganism by some of the law-enforcement officials clearly visible in the documentary.( Since when’s filming for a professional-work OUTSIDE the CONTAINMENT-ZONE a criminal offence? And that too, supposedly a “free-society”?)

The fact that AJMN® is offering to host their views even now, if only for the assured-safety of its employees — speaks volumes.
& ohh… Unlike your compatriots who love to stand in solidarity with the Palestinians and now, Kashmiris but don’t care about Rohingyas when they’re in their own backyard: Exposed deftly

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x