Home Web Specials Malaysia’s national role conceptions and transitions of foreign policy from Tunku to...

Malaysia’s national role conceptions and transitions of foreign policy from Tunku to Mahathir

Join us on Telegram and Instagram for the latest.

Johan Saravanamuttu reviews the history and trajectory of Malaysia’s foreign policy in this video lecture, organised by the University of Malaya’s Asia-Europe Institute.

The lecture highlights national role conceptions during the Tunku Abdul Rahman’s period from 1957 to 1968 and the first and second Dr Mahathir Mohamad tenures of 1981-2003 and 2018-2020 respectively.

Malaysia’s foreign policy and its fundamentals have remained reasonably stable over prolonged periods but national role conceptions, which define foreign policy, have witnessed shifting nuances and noticeable changes under different prime ministers.

Foreign policy under succeeding Malaysian governments have seen major shifts occurring in the transition of foreign policy in tandem with changing national role conceptions.

Malaysian foreign policy has been articulated within the constraints posed by the global and regional environment and that of a highly politicised, often divided domestic landscape.

In the Tunku era, Malaysia was decidedly a Western ally, symbolised by national role conceptions of being “pro-West” and “anti-communist”.

Since then, Malaysia’s relations with major powers and regional countries have shown a stable, neutral and non-aligned stance, and it emerged as a “regional neutral strategist” under the premiership of Abdul Razak Hussein.

The lecture suggests that the shifts and revisions in Malaysia’s national role conceptions under Mahathir as a “global champion of the South”, exemplar of “Looking East” and “champion of moderate Islam” were not all just outcomes of elite preferences but reflected the political agendas of elites and political agents within the domestic “political game”.

The lecture draws on some examples domestic contestations over national role conceptions and foreign policy to show the re-definition and even the abandonment of policy directions which were not consonant with the imperatives of the domestic political game.

READ MORE:  Dennis Ignatius on 'paradise' won and lost

(This lecture is based on a revised version paper written by Johan together with Eugene Mark and Nawaljeet Singh, his co-researchers in the project. The original paper was entitled “Revisiting National Role Conceptions under Mahathir Governments: Contestations and Transitions in Malaysian Foreign Policy”. While gratefully acknowledging the substantive contributions of my co-researchers to the original paper, they should not be held responsible for errors, omissions and the arguments of this current version)

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x