Pakatan Harapan leaders have to be humble, receptive and seek out solutions that critics, opinion leaders and civil society may offer, writes JD Lovrenciear.
Pakatan Harapan’s defeat in the Rantau by election is not just a loss. It is a siren call that PH can only dismiss or downplay at its own peril.
As opposition MP Khairy Jamaluddin said, despite deploying its arsenal of machinery on the Rantau voters, who are not naive, PH lost the battle.
If PH leaders dismiss the outcome as the voters’ lack of direction, then they are wrong.
Why are people disregarding all the corruption charges against noted Barisan Nasional leaders and instead throwing their majority support behind BN?
- Sign up for Aliran's free daily email updates or weekly newsletters or both
- Make a one-off donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB a/c 8004240948
- Make a pledge or schedule an auto donation to Aliran every month or every quarter
- Become an Aliran member
This is the most fundamental missing piece in PH’s montage to lead the country. It cannot be that the voters are dismissing PH so soon, barely a year since they voted for PH to defeat the colossal BN giant.
PH leaders need not lock themselves in the war room to find clues. Talk to the people and listen to them. Accept what they have been telling you and do not give explanations why you cannot do what they expect you to do.
Engage with civil society and critics. Bring them on board.
Listen to opinion leaders. Create viable platforms for them to work with you.
Pay attention to the flood of sentiments pouring out on all social media platforms. Call on all those who take time out of concern to write letters to the editor.
Next, plug the “deep state” operatives immediately. Otherwise PH would lose the advantage even before it realises.
Counting on Sabah and Sarawak may look good on the drawing board. But the harsh reality is the perceptions gaining momentum from the Rantau loss will outdo anything PH thinks it can pull through.
PH leaders’ counter arguments that time is needed to make good its election manifesto promises may be a fact. But in shaping public opinion, facts often do not matter. Experiences or what we call the Sitz im Leben (setting in life or context) are the deciding factors.
PH may be caught in a Catch-22 situation. On the one hand, people are worried about what happens to PH’s leadership succession, considering the advancing age of Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad. But on the other hand, we have heard talk about the power struggle brewing within PH corridors. Add the two together, and we have further uncertainty about the future of PH.
The Rantau outcome also tells us that when push comes to shove, people could dump PH and go for BN.
Why? What is important for most people is putting food on the table, paying bills without nightmares, making businesses progress with hopes of success and being spoilt for choice when it comes to employment opportunities.
When difficulties are encountered in these areas and these concerns have bothered the rakyat over the past year, PH has to be humble, receptive and seek out solutions that critics, opinion leaders and civil society may offer.
PH does not have two or three years to win the race. Perceptions are building up fast and these are being capitalised on by BN. They will be even harder to dissolve and reshape with each advancing month.
Common sense must prevail. And do not dismiss the simplistic voices of the person in the street.
And one final hint for PH is when the going gets tough, it needs to invest more in its communications machinery.
AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
- Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
- Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
- Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
- Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
- Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
As a citizen I expected what was preached by PH will finally be seen. Unfortunately what we here everyday is Melayu, Bumiputera, Tanah Melayu, Raja Melayu, Malay Rights…………..
This nation and almost 85% of Tax paying citizens have gone deaf, sick, nausea, feed-up of listening this nonsense for the past 50 years.
Probably the Conclusion is;
There is no difference between UMNO BN & PH
Whilst I agree that Pakatan needs to listen to the people more, address issues such as still high cost ofliving, the weak ringgit, fulfil more of its election promises and so forth, however BN win with 63.22% of the votes in Rantau is status quo, given that BN has won Rantau with close to two-thirds of the vote since 2008 and that Rantau has alternated between BN parties MIC and UMNO since the 1959 GE, with the exception of the 1955GE where the Socialist Front won Rantau.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rantau_(state_constituency)
If Tok Mat had won Rantau with 70% or 80% of the votes in the recent by-election, that would represent a popular swing towards BN, as happened in Cameron Highlands and Semenyih.
PH has not created any impact. People feel situations are still the same. All social problems still prevail. Cost of living is high. Transportation issues, environmental issues, educational matters and so on. PH has not done any great job yet that can touch the life of the ordinary citizens. PH must listen to the people. They know how to do it but they are not doing.