Home Web Specials The line between Raya and ‘pilihan raya’

The line between Raya and ‘pilihan raya’

ANIL NETTO/ALIRAN

Follow us on our Malay and English WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, Tiktok and Youtube channels.

Hari Raya Aidilfitri open houses are a common sight where the Malay-Muslim hosts welcome visitors from diverse backgrounds to celebrate with them after the end of the blessed month of Ramadan.

In fact, a plan was already afoot recently to hold a much bigger Raya party by the Pakatan Harapan-led Selangor state government supposedly as part of the celebratory mood.

But therein lies the rub. The Raya event, which was held on 27 April, happened in Kuala Kubu Baharu shortly after the nomination of candidates for a by-election scheduled for 11 May.

The Kuala Kubu Bharu state assembly seat fell vacant following the death of its three-term assembly member, Lee Kee Hiong, on 21 March owing to cancer.

Predictably, the state-sponsored celebration raised concerns among the public, particularly the Coalition for Free and Fair Elections (Bersih), which insisted that throwing such a big party at a place where a by-election was to be held would breach provisions under the Election Offences Act 1954. 

Why couldn’t the party be held elsewhere, such as Klang, Shah Alam or Sungai Buloh? 

According to Selangor Journal, published under the auspices of the Menteri Besar Selangor Incorporated, Kuala Kubu Bharu was chosen as the venue for the Raya open house because of the town’s “distinct charm and cultural heritage”.

But this may not be the primary motivating factor for the guests, particularly those from the local communities. 

Bersih was also concerned that the event would possibly involve using state government resources, which would suggest abuse of power.

A sitting government has access to resources that could be used in the calculated efforts to win the hearts and minds of voters, thus making the playing field uneven.

Seen from this perspective, the purported generosity of the state government to hold a big party appeared to be misplaced.

But this was not the first in recent times that Bersih felt that the line had been crossed.

Bersih earlier criticised Housing and Local Government Minister Nga Kor Ming for having announced a RM5.2m allocation to upgrade public infrastructure facilities in Kuala Kubu Bharu before the by-election.

It didn’t help that Nga reportedly said in a rather cavalier fashion: “It’s not just because of the by-election. We chose this area because it’s an auspicious place. The ‘feng shui’ here is good.”

READ MORE:  Bersih selar pengumuman peruntukan terpilih kerajaan di Kuala Kubu Bharu

One could perhaps argue that any place has good “feng shui” if it serves a certain agenda. 

It is noteworthy that the minister also reportedly contributed RM10,000 to the volunteer fire brigade in Kuala Kubu Bharu and RM127,050 for upgrades to the Sri Sithi Vinayagar temple.

In addition, there was also a contribution of RM250,000 to Persatuan Penganut Dewa Siaw Kong dan Dewi Lee Ma to repair its house of worship. 

Such funding can be read as an inducement to vote for the benefactors. 

The Kuala Kubu Bharu constituency has mixed ethnic demographics of 46% Malays, 30% Chinese, 18% Indians and 6% others. So, the Malay and minority components of the constituency are split down the middle. 

When posed the concern about the elaborate Hari Raya do, Home Minister Saifuddin Nasution Ismail responded that the public could make their own decisions on whether election laws were broken in the build-up to the Kuala Kubu Bharu by-election. 

That was not the answer that we were looking for. The public might have formed their own conclusions on this important matter, but what then is the “Madani” (civil and compassionate) government’s principled stand on it?

To be sure, election offences are nothing new. In fact, both the government and the opposition had been implicated in the past.

For instance, in the Seri Setia and Balakong by-elections in 2018, both the ruling Pakatan Harapan coalition and the opposition were found by Bersih 2.0 to have committed election offences. PH committed more offences than their rivals. 

In Seri Setia, PH gave out white T-shirts and organised banquets in both by-elections. The MCA, on the other hand, gave free medical check-ups in Balakong.

READ MORE:  Rumah terbuka Aidilfitri di KKB: Kenyataan Bersih dan respons MB Selangor

Both the MCA and Pas gave out gifts to voters in their campaigns for both by-elections.

Two wrongs obviously don’t make a right. That is why we would expect a government with a reformist agenda to make a difference in the interest of democracy.

Or has the line become too fuzzy over time to make a distinction? – The Malaysian Insight

The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
  1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
  2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
  3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
  4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
  5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Most Read

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x