Home Web Specials University vice-chancellor’s sledgehammer response to Malay forum query

University vice-chancellor’s sledgehammer response to Malay forum query

Wong Yan Ke Facebook

Follow us on our Malay and English WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, Tiktok and Youtube channels.

What is vital is a free flow of ideas in academia that would help subvert attempts at promoting narrow-mindedness and sheer denseness, writes Mustafa K Anuar.

The University of Malaya, particularly its vice-chancellor, Abdul Rahim Hashim, seems to have a penchant for courting controversies that academics worth their salt would not want to touch with a barge pole.

The university has lodged a police report over the protest made at its recent convocation by civil engineering graduate Wong Yan Ke, who claimed that the vice-chancellor made a racist remark at the Malay Dignity Congress.

Flashing a placard on stage that demanded the vice-chancellor’s resignation, attacked racism, and insisted that the country is a Malaysian land (not Malay land), Wong made his point crystal clear in an unconventional way at a ceremony that is usually filled with protocol and conventions. This, in turn, earned the wrath of the university administration.

But making a police report against this peaceful protest is akin to the university resorting to a sledgehammer to kill an ant, especially when Wong was merely exercising his freedom of speech – which shouldn’t be criminalised.

While it could be argued that the protest at the convocation went against the conventions of a solemn ceremony, lodging a police report against the graduate doesn’t answer questions posed to the vice-chancellor.

If anything, it suggests a feeble attempt to demonise the student who was willing to stand his ground. The university has already blamed Wong for having sullied “the good name of UM”.

Given the available facts of the matter, we earnestly wonder who really is the one who smeared the university’s image over this issue.

READ MORE:  University reforms: Purpose, pedagogy and politics

The vice-chancellor offering an explanation for his displeasure regarding this incident and for his Malay congress participation, in a civilised manner, would have been a dignified option. This would have been in line with Education Minister Maszlee Malik’s insistence that the vice-chancellor is an open-minded academic.

This incident could have been avoided had the vice-chancellor cared to explain in an intellectual fashion, soon after the congress had ended, his presence at the gathering, which, for all intents and purposes, was partisan and racist.

Apart from concerned students, certain civil society groups have also demanded an explanation for his participation – and that of other universities – in the controversial congress, whose intellectual scope was myopic and exclusive, apart from the rabble-rousing elements in it.

If being labelled racist is not a badge of honour, then it is incumbent upon the vice-chancellor to make his official position clear – as this form of negativity would indirectly have an adverse effect on the reputation of the country’s oldest university.

Right-thinking Malaysians are also concerned that universities funded by taxpayers’ money, contributed by all ethnic groups, had lent legitimacy to this congress, which stirred uneasiness, especially among non-Malays.

To be sure, public expressions that are tinged with racism would only compound a social environment that is already heavily laden with the politics of race and religion.

Besides, it violates the conventions of an academic discourse when only one side of the argument was championed by the congress while opposing views were not given a decent platform at the meeting.

READ MORE:  60 NGOs applaud PM's directive to admit students unable to pay fees

A university that is serious about bolstering its reputation as an institution of academic excellence cannot afford to be distracted by elements in society that have narrow and dangerous agendas.

What is vital is a free flow of ideas in academia that would help subvert attempts at promoting narrow-mindedness and sheer denseness.

Source: themalaysianinsight.com

The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
  1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
  2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
  3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
  4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
  5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DR.SURANTHIRAN NAIDU M.N.NAIDU
DR.SURANTHIRAN NAIDU M.N.NAIDU
22 Oct 2019 4.01pm

From the reports we have,MU and VC need to revisit certain unalterable facts. These relate centrally to the Us and their ‘public’ officials’ participation in MDC. Hishamudin Onn J. wrote a piece after the fact, that it is ok. That it was directed at the foundation of necessary Malay unity which he felt, will help to build national integration. This, possibly, is an old song-excuse to distract the masses. We remember the UMNO meeting occasions when he wielded the kris, a noble and historical Nusantara weapon, at a national-Malaysian-Malay gathering.It was scary.He did apologise belatedly.The good name of my alma mater has been tarnished.The ‘other’, non-Bumiputera tax-payers are saddened and astonished that public officials being…..

1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x