Home Web Specials What is the ‘big tent’ ideology?

What is the ‘big tent’ ideology?

Opposition parties should organise a forum and thrash out what their common ideology would be if they govern the country

The Sheraton Move showed up Pakatan Harapan's lack of a common ideology

Join us on Telegram and Instagram for the latest.

Since the humiliating defeat of Pakatan Harapan in the Malacca, Sarawak and Johor elections, there have been calls by its leaders for the opposition parties to unite.

A “big tent” unity approach is seen as the way forward against a resurgent Barisan Nasional.

This came about after PKR contested the polls using its own logo instead of PH’s, and the opposition parties were seen as fragmented and opposing one another.

The truth is, PH leaders seem to be focusing on how to beat BN with the suggestion of bringing all opposition parties within a coalition, without thinking about what would happen if they win the election. Are they not aware that many voters desire enduring stability in governance? It seems that the means and ends do not measure up.

The underlying factor that brought the opposition parties together in the 2018 general election was the need to ensure Najib’s defeat and to end the biggest corruption scandal in the history of the country.

What happened after the objective was met? The political games played by Bersatu to show that it was the sole protector of Malay rights, in competition with Umno, resulting in parties like the DAP being accused by supporters of being silent on Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s racist rhetoric. The so-called Malay Dignity Congress was used to play up the racial card to benefit a party that had won the lowest number of seats in the 2018 general election.

Mahathir capitalised on PKR’s power struggle it to ensure that those who opposed Anwar Ibrahim’s aim of becoming prime minister were cemented in critical ministerial portfolios.

READ MORE:  Three factors behind BN win in Johor

PH was torn apart by racial rhetoric from Umno and Pas. At the same time, other parties like the DAP had to face the anger of their supporters.

What was obvious was PH did not have a coherent ideology of governance and justice, and this brought about a string of defeats in five by-elections with the majority of the Malay community registering protest votes against PH, which they  perceived to be controlled by the DAP – even though such an accusation was not based on facts.

Controversial issues such as the Mahathir’s opposition to a significant increase in the minimum wage and the scrapping of highway tolls and his statement that the PH manifesto was not written in stone revealed an incoherent PH government.

The absence of a coherent ideology that was acceptable to all of PH component parties was one of the core reasons the coalition failed. The result was the Sheraton Move that revealed a pact that had failed to provide a stable and viable government.

The current rhetoric about a big tent with parties that have differing ideologies would result in the emergence of the same issues if ethno-religious parties such as Pejuang and Bersatu are going to be part of the coalition.

Before speaking about a big tent approach in facing BN, it is vital to discuss a coherent ideology which is critical for a coalition to survive in the long run. The absence of a shadow cabinet itself shows that PH is not prepared to govern.

BN is a strong political entity despite being riddled with corruption scandals due to its coherent ideology of stability and development.

READ MORE:  Reclaim our nation! 53 NGOs back People’s Agenda for general election

PH and other opposition parties have to fix the missing link because it is not just about victory, but what happens after attaining victory.

It is time for opposition parties to organise a forum and thrash out what their fundamental ideology of unity would be if they govern the country. Many discerning voters would want such a move. – The Malaysian Insight

AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
  1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
  2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
  3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
  4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
  5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps:


The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John
John
26 Mar 2022 11.07am

PH should not be too engrossed in removing BN, that it is willing to work with anyone and sacrifice their core principle to achieve this aim. Their experience of working with bersatu during GE14 should be a valuable lesson to them.

Stay with your 3 core component parties, who have stood together through good and bad. The reason bersatu won that many seats in GE14 was because of its association with PH, the same can be said with Muda. Working with them means you have to give up our win able seats for these parties who do not share the same core principle as PH, worst they back stab you.

PH, do not ever work with bersatu, pejuang and all the other new mushrooming parties. If you do, we the voters, will teach you a lesson.

Most Read

1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x