Home Web Specials When UniMAP’s response to exam question begs more questions

When UniMAP’s response to exam question begs more questions

Zakir Naik - Photograph: Maapu - Creative Commons, commons.wikimedia.org

Follow us on our Malay and English WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, Tiktok and Youtube channels.

University autonomy must be accompanied by accountability to academia and the public, especially when there are issues that have social and political repercussions, writes Mustafa K Anuar.

Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP) failed to enlighten Malaysians, particularly academics and students, regarding its controversial exam paper on ethnic relations recently.

Defending the paper that hails Indian preacher Zakir Naik as an icon of the Muslim world, following public calls for accountability, UniMAP vice-chancellor R Badlishah Ahmad insisted that there was nothing wrong with the question.

Indeed, there is something wrong with his response given that the university academics concerned had skewed answers to the exam question on Zakir in a way that only projected him as a personality beyond reproach and intellectual scrutiny.

In other words, the answers provided could be read as the question-setters being insensitive to the sentiments of students, especially non-Muslim ones, whose communities already had issues with the preacher.

Badlishah said there was an error found in choice number four in question 60 of the paper, which was the word ignorant that was wrongly translated into Malay as “bodoh”.

But, as implied above, the problem with the paper was more than just the misinterpreted “bodoh”, because the way the answers were crafted suggests an element of ignorance, if not denseness, on the part of the setters regarding our social context.

To be clear, the exam setters, who were said to be multi-ethnic, had not taken into consideration that a question about Zakir framed in such a way was unsuitable, nay troubling, in a context where divisive politics is practised to the hilt by purveyors of ethno-centrism and religious bigotry in the country.

READ MORE:  Reform our universities and their myriad of unresolved problems

In other words, it was the exam setters that were out of sync with our social context. Contrary to what Badlishah claimed, the critics of the exam paper didn’t take the question out of context.

If this was the result of a conscious and careful vetting of exam questions by the exam-setters, then they must have turned the term “vetting” on its head.

For the uninitiated, vetting normally requires close scrutiny of the exam papers, looking out for misspellings as well as factual errors and questions that do not meet the overall objective of the course concerned.

The scrutiny of exam questions for a paper on ethnic relations should demand stringent inspection to avoid not only inviting unnecessary misinterpretation that could lead to students losing marks but also giving legitimacy to ethnic bigotry and religious extremism among students.

In an academic setting such as universities, it is imperative that exam questions set should help enlighten students about complex and intriguing issues such as race and religion.

While academics ought to have the freedom to design their respective course structures, have their own pedagogy and set exam questions without the interference of university authorities, it doesn’t necessarily mean that a serious misstep, such as the Zakir question, should make the authorities look the other way.

Similarly, university autonomy that was promoted by former education minister Maszlee Malik should not be interpreted to mean that the university has carte blanche to do almost anything it wishes without caring two hoots about serious criticism from academics and the general public. For this autonomy must be accompanied by accountability to academia as well as the public, especially when there are issues that have social and political repercussions.

READ MORE:  University reforms: Purpose, pedagogy and politics

Let the nagging questions regarding the exam paper be answered adequately and responsibly through a thorough and independent investigation.

UniMAP will be doing a great service to itself if it makes this move.

Source: The Malaysian Insight

The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
  1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
  2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
  3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
  4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
  5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps:
Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
SNaidu, Dr.
SNaidu, Dr.
6 Feb 2020 6.45pm

Concerned Malaysian citizens simply desire well-being for all Msns.All public undertakings have to show clarity,logic and objectivity,positive directions for universal good.All Msns must be seen to gain proportionate benefit.Malay-Muslim privileges and rights as per OUR Constitution are fine, albeit moderated, as period of NEP official duration is long over.Would it not be truly meaningful that today all Msns are seen as working for what they RIGHTLY deserve?Our future MSNs-OUR YOUNG, can hold their heads high in the global community, instead of grudgingly struggling to MAKE a future for their children. And migrating off weakening OUR fundamentals.It is STILL a daily longing to be human, equal, law-abiding MSNs.REAL BUMI natives’ NEEDS???.

Khoo Soo Hay
Khoo Soo Hay
5 Feb 2020 10.04am

I think our academics, in particular coming from the north in Perlis, are too dense to realize that this so called religious preacher , Zakir Naik from India, is persona non grata in this country. He should not be mentioned at all in the social press as well as in any medium since he is so controversial in his religious views and interfering in the politics of this country.

Ravi Nair
Ravi Nair
5 Feb 2020 9.45am

Do these fanatic idiots every learn that the Earth, Ocean, Sky & Air we breath does not belong to a single Race or Religion?????

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x