Home Web Specials When vested interests are cloaked in the people’s robes

When vested interests are cloaked in the people’s robes

Follow us on our Malay and English WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, Tiktok and Youtube channels.

People need to ascertain whose interests are really being served when a government decides to craft a certain policy or take stern action in their name and so-called national interests. Mustafa K Anuar writes.

When Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin’s government sought consent recently from Yang di-Pertuan Agong Al-Sultan Abdullah Ri’ayatuddin Al-Mustafa Billah Shah to declare a state of emergency over the entire federation, Malaysians from all walks of life were predictably overwhelmed by a sense of anxiety and even fear, as such a declaration has wide-ranging implications.

A state of emergency, usually invoked in extreme circumstances, entails specific restrictions – including the suspension of parliamentary democracy and civil liberties – imposed upon society supposedly aimed at protecting the overall wellbeing of ordinary citizens.

In this case, it was supposed to help fight the coronavirus pandemic for the protection of the health of all Malaysians.

On the surface, this would have given the impression that the government was imbued with the noble aim of attending to the people’s interests in the wake of the ravaging pandemic that prompted it declare a state of emergency.

However, as the turn of events recently revealed, the vested interests of the political leaders – that is, to protect their own political survival – took precedence over the larger interests of Malaysians. In other words, the ruling politicians attempted to pursue their narrow agenda under the cover of the ‘people’s or national interests’.

It is noteworthy that in such a situation the politicians concerned are inclined to use words such as “our” or “we” to project an inclusive outlook – and not one that is self-serving. Even such phrases as “saving Malaysia” (read, saving “our nation”) can be usefully employed by different groups for different purposes.

This goes to show that even in a society that has only a semblance of democracy, political leaders who have a certain political design are persuaded to make their narrow agenda appear big enough so that unsuspecting ordinary people may want to claim ownership and subscribe to it.

At the very least, a government, more so one that has got no mandate from the people, would want to be seen as taking steps that supposedly benefit the people. It would be equally important for it to sway the people to accept such measures.

However, the justification for a state of emergency, pursued by Muhyiddin and his cabinet colleagues, was not convincing enough in the face of protests from politicians, civil society organisations and academics, especially when gruesome scenarios in the larger society were presented: capital flight, curbs on the democratic process, investors’ lack of confidence, folded businesses and acute unemployment.

In addition, the material and human resources for healthcare are said to be adequate to handle the spike in Covid-19 infections in the country.

As a result, the emergency proposal did not gain the desired traction among the people or the palace. The social context was not conducive to such a drastic action.

Another instance where the interests or concerns of the people were invoked by the government was the political clampdown codenamed Operation Lalang, executed by Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s administration 33 years ago in the name of protecting national security.

That resulted in the mass arrest of 106 people comprising social activists, politicians and academics under the now-repealed Internal Security Act. In addition, the publishing permits of four publications, known for their critical stance, were revoked.

Critics maintained that those arrested had crossed swords with Mahathir over his controversial policies. In short, he brooked no dissent.

The takeaway here: people need to ascertain whose interests are really being served when a government decides to craft a certain policy or take stern action in their name and so-called national interests or national security. Otherwise, they may be taken for a ride.

Source: themalaysianinsight.com

The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
  1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
  2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
  3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
  4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
  5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps:
Avatar photo
Dr Mustafa K Anuar, a longtime executive committee member and former honorary secretary of Aliran, is, co-editor of our newsletter. He obtained his PhD from City, University of London and is particularly interested in press freedom and freedom of expression issues. These days, he is a a senior journalist with an online media portal
Notify of
1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
loyal malaysian
loyal malaysian
19 Nov 2020 5.51pm

Mustafa, are you being polite?
Are you alluding to the state of emergency declared in Batu Sapi?
Going by that argument, Gerik and that state constituency in Sabah are next.

My political leanings are obvious but with covid 19 spreading in community, a postponement of by-elections afforded by the emergency may not be a bad thing.

I wonder if it is too evil to pray for more state of emergency to be declared in pengkianat nasional constituencies!!

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x