We sorely need people like Siti who can speak up for all Malaysians without fear or favour, says P Ramakrishnan.
It is befuddling to a discerning mind why the police are targeting Siti Kasim over a matter that occurred two-and-a-half years ago!
It is baffling that the police should be embroiled in a frivolous matter when many urgent matters deserve their attention.
So many politicians from Pas and Umno had made inflammatory speeches and outrageous statements that posed a real and genuine threat to our national peace and harmony. Calling on Muslims only to vote for a Muslim candidate and lying about the DAP wanting to Christianise Malaysia are issues that are crying out for police action to preserve our unity. Sadly, nothing seems to have taken place despite their utterances having the potential to inflame emotions and cause havoc in the country.
Siti’s show of her middle finger pales in comparison to what the atrocious statements by these petty politicians could have caused the nation.
The social activist reacted – as anyone would have – when she was jeered and heckled for speaking against the enforcement of Sharia laws at a forum on 5 September 2016. Siti, a lawyer, was entitled to her views and she had the freedom guaranteed by the Constitution to express herself.
But there were intolerant and ignorant participants with the herd mentality who provoked her unnecessarily and irrationally. Did her reaction to her tormentors in any way disturb the peace and harmony of the nation?
It is ridiculous to think that the police had to wait two-and-a-half years before deciding to act now despite the Attorney General’s Chambers having given the go-ahead in April 2018.
The Selangor Criminal Investigation Department chief, Fadzil Ahmat, who stands accused of wanting to put Siti behind bars, claimed that the police had to put on hold this case because of the 2018 general election. The election ended on 9 May 2018, and now nine months later, Fadzil wants to act against Siti. What prevented him from acting earlier soon after the election? We are entitled to an honest response from him.
It is more than ten months since the Attorney General’s Chambers instructed him to act against Siti in April 2018; can he justify this delay? Does the delay constitute a dereliction of duty? It is a flimsy excuse to claim that he planned to press charges against Siti together with another case that took place involving her in June 2018.
These are unrelated cases and Fadzil was not obliged to press charges together. The strange thing is that he is yet to receive instructions from the Attorney General’s Chambers regarding the Kajang case when Siti’s house was raided unjustly. Perhaps, Putrajaya does not think that this is such an urgent case to pursue.
Before Pakatan Harapan took over the government, many silly things had taken place defying logic, challenging reason and questioning the rule of law. If Fadzil had received the go-ahead from the former attorney general, it may not hold water in the present situation.
The former attorney general’s conduct and decisions were extremely questionable. Many wondered aloud whether the former attorney general was acting in the interest of justice or acting to safeguard the interests of Najib and Barisan Nasional. Perhaps, Fadzil should get fresh instructions from the present attorney general.
Thinking and caring Malaysians would want the Attorney General’s Chambers to drop these frivolous and puerile charges against Siti. It is such a waste of time and cost to go after a woman social activist who dared to stand her ground and speak up without being influenced by race and religion.
We sorely need people like Siti who can speak up for ALL Malaysians without fear or favour. Siti indeed deserves the support of Malaysians who care for this nation.