The asset declarations made recently by PKR president Anwar Ibrahim and his deputy Rafizi Ramli were rightly welcomed by anti-graft activists, who at the same time called on other election candidates to follow suit.
Rafizi, the party’s first candidate to do so, declared that his net assets are worth RM18.8m, most of which constitute shares in data analytics company Invoke.
On his part, Anwar declared assets worth about RM11.2m, which consists of a house and three plots of land worth RM10.4m million and about RM0.8m in cash and savings.
Most of PKR’s election candidates have published their asset declarations on the website for the party’s candidates.
Candidates from the Socialist Party of Malaysia (PSM) also declared their assets, and so have some Amanah candidates, as well as Muda president Syed Saddiq Abdul Rahman.
- Sign up for Aliran's free daily email updates or weekly newsletters or both
- Make a one-off donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB a/c 8004240948
- Make a pledge or schedule an auto donation to Aliran every month or every quarter
- Become an Aliran member
Such declarations, however, have elicited a curious response from Pas.
The Islamist party’s vice-president Mohd Amar Nik Abdullah reportedly announced that the party did not intend to encourage, let alone compel, its candidates to declare their assets.
He argued that Pas leaders are not wealthy and could be embarrassed when compared with other candidates who might have assets worth millions of ringgit.
Besides, he added, it should only apply to people holding public office.
Amar also cautioned that such an exercise would bring more harm than good, as it could put at risk those who expose themselves.
But then, one might argue that it is most likely only the rich candidates – not the moderately well-off or relatively less moneyed candidates – who declare their assets who would come under the public glare or spark curiosity.
It seems as if Pas has sadly mistaken such declarations for a who-is-richer contest.
We should be mindful that the intention of the declaration exercise has never been to embarrass a candidate who is not rolling in wealth and blessed with other forms of material abundance.
As intimated above, a candidate who is overwhelmingly wealthy should have cause to worry or be embarrassed if they cannot convincingly explain how the wealth has been accumulated.
If wealth is indeed a crucial requirement for an election candidate, then the likes of Jose Mujica would shy away from standing for elections and winning, let alone leading a country. The former president of Uruguay is known to have led a spartan lifestyle, living on his wife’s ramshackle farm and driving a rickety 1987 Volkswagen Beetle to boot.
Obviously, Mujica has no preference for such marques as Mercedes Benz, BMW, Porsche and (Toyota) Vellfire, which other politicians would find too difficult to resist.
Former Kelantan menteri besar, the late Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat, should be a nagging reminder to the Pas leadership that the possession of immense wealth should not be a required factor or criterion to play a useful and vital role in politics.
What is also important is that candidates should have the commitment, humility and sincerity to work in the interest of their constituencies – and not to occupy positions of power only to enrich themselves materially.
Voters dislike candidates who are disconnected from the rest of society in terms of lifestyle and worldview soon after being voted into power.
To be sure, asset declarations are to prevent corruption, apart from promoting transparency and accountability, and checking conflicts of interest and unlawful enrichments. They would also enable voters to compare candidates’ economic status prior to elections with their positions after they assume public office.
Making such a comparison is especially important in a society like ours, where corruption has become embedded in political culture. Besides, a candidate’s credibility and integrity can also be enhanced through asset declarations.
It is hoped that unlike Pas, other political parties such as the DAP and Bersatu would not be “embarrassed” to have their candidates publicly declare their assets. – The Malaysian Insight