Home Web Specials Why the Attorney General’s Chambers must explain its decision to drop all...

Why the Attorney General’s Chambers must explain its decision to drop all charges against Zahid

The chambers must explain why it now rejects the High Court's prima facie findings against Zahid which were based on its own evidence

Zahid Hamidi - WIKIPEDIA

Follow us on our Malay and English WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, Tiktok and Youtube channels.

Ramkarpal Singh

The decision by the Attorney General’s Chambers to take no further action in respect of the 47 charges for which Deputy PM Zahid Hamidi was charged, does not inspire confidence and raises questions over the transparency of investigations into the matter by the chambers.

In a statement, the chambers attributed the decision to a comprehensive review of the material before it, although no mention was made whether it had reviewed the prima facie findings of the High Court in 2022.

 With respect, it must be stressed that this is not a case in which no findings were made.

It is common knowledge that the High Court had found a prima facie case against Zahid at the end of the prosecution’s case in 2022 after the trial had commenced some four years earlier in 2019, with many witnesses having given evidence on behalf of the prosecution.

As such, there can be no doubt that such findings were based on evidence which Zahid was, in law, obliged to rebut – until the prosecution applied for an order of discharge not amounting to acquittal from all the 47 charges on 4 September 2023.

The Attorney General’s Chambers’ statement clearly lacks substance and amounts to a mere general statement that it is now satisfied that the matter ought not to be proceeded with.

Given the above, the chambers must explain why it is now of the view that the prima facie findings of the High Court against Zahid do not carry weight, especially when those findings were based on its own evidence led in court.

READ MORE:  Deferred prosecution agreements must not contribute to trend of powerful elites escaping liability

With respect, a failure by the chambers to provide a satisfactory explanation will be likely to further erode confidence in it, which is ill-advised.

Ramkarpal Singh is the MP for Bukit Gelugor.

The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
  1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
  2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
  3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
  4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
  5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Most Read

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x