ALIRAN
   Home     Aliran Monthly    Statements   Human Rights    NGOs   Links   Join Us   About Us   

Media Statement

Name Justice Muhammad's Caller
Establish Royal Commission of Inquiry

kamil Aliran wholeheartedly applauds Justice Muhammad Kamil Awang for his honesty, courage and sense of public duty.

Justice Muhammad has been admirably honest and courageous in refusing to submit to a directive from someone supposedly his superior in the judicial hierarchy to strike off, without hearing, the Likas election petitions.

Equally Justice Muhammad has demonstrated a high sense of public duty in refusing to cover up that attempt to subvert the course of justice in one of the High Courts of the country.

However, the time for guessing games is past.

While it was entirely proper for Justice Muhammad to inform Chief Justice Mohamed Dzaiddin Abdullah about the 'mysterious caller' first, the caller's identity cannot be allowed to remain a mystery or a matter of speculation.

The fact is, too many unsavoury episodes that have struck at the reputation of our judiciary have been allowed to remain unsolved mysteries.

To take some notable examples:

  • The investigation of a surat layang purportedly containing a judge's allegations of corruption against other judges was terminated by then Attorney-General Mohtar Abdullah without the public being any wiser as to the truth of the allegations.

  • If at all a thorough investigation was conducted into allegations that lawyer V K Lingam's office was responsible for drafting a judgment made in a High Court case, the result of the investigation has not been publicly disclosed.

  • The investigation of allegations of improprieties and unethical conduct linking former Chief Justice Eusoffe Chin with lawyer V K Lingam was also inconclusive.

Consequently, the Malaysian public is by now sick and tired of hearing allegations of tampering with the judicial system that lead nowhere - no cases, no culprits and no penalties.

It would therefore make a complete mockery of Justice Muhammad's honesty, courage and sense of public duty if this latest episode of alleged judicial misconduct is allowed to die a quiet death.

That kind of quiet death is the NATO - 'no action, talk only' - kind that the public associates with the Barisan Nasional government's reluctance or inability to deal with the perceived rot within our system of administration of justice.

In the past few weeks, however, several judges have shown that it is possible for politically weak and commercially powerless citizens to obtain redress in our Courts.

For the record, there have been:

  • Justice Mohd Hishamudin Mohd Yunus's declarations that the use of ISA is unlawful
  • Justice Ian Chin's decision protecting native customary rights of marginalized Sarawakian communities, and
  • Justice Muhammad Kamil Awang's nullification of the Likas election.

The reputation of the Malaysian judicial system has suffered serious setbacks in recent years. Yet in recent weeks, honest, courageous and impartial judgments have been delivered.

Whichever way the judicial system moves in the near future - towards decline or resurgence - will depend on how much the problems of the judicial system can be resolved, so that the rule of law can operate freely and judges can conduct their cases without fear or favour or directives.

In the light of these developments, Aliran calls for the establishment of a Royal Commission of Inquiry which will comprehensively and without compromise investigate many of the outstanding allegations of impropriety, misconduct and interference in our judicial system.

Only when the results of an independent investigation are made known to the public can we ever hope to lay to rest the suspicion that 'something is rotten in the House of Denmark', to use one High Court judge's warning about the state of our judicial system.

Aliran Executive Committee
12 June 2001